Advances and Challenges of <scp>SCAN</scp> and <scp>r<sup>2</sup>SCAN</scp> Density Functionals in Transition‐Metal Compounds

ABSTRACT Transition‐metal compounds (TMCs) with open‐shell d ‐electrons are characterized by a complex interplay of lattice, charge, orbital, and spin degrees of freedom, giving rise to various fascinating applications. Often exhibiting exotic properties, these compounds are commonly classified as correlated systems due to strong inter‐electronic interactions called Hubbard U . This inherent complexity presents significant challenges to Kohn‐Sham density functional theory (KS‐DFT), the most widely used electronic structure method in condensed matter physics and materials science. While KS‐DFT is, in principle, exact for the ground‐state total energy, its exchange‐correlation energy must be approximated in practice. The mean‐field nature of KS implementations, combined with the limitations of current exchange‐correlation density functional approximations, has led to the perception that DFT is inadequate for correlated systems, particularly TMCs. Consequently, a common workaround involves augmenting DFT with an on‐site Hubbard‐like U correction. In recent years, the strongly constrained and appropriately normed (SCAN) density functional, along with its refined variant r 2 SCAN, has achieved remarkable progress in accurately describing the structural, energetic, electronic, magnetic, and vibrational properties of TMCs, challenging the traditional perception of DFT's limitations. This review explores the design principles of SCAN and r 2 SCAN, highlights their key advancements in studying TMCs, explains the mechanisms driving these improvements, and addresses the remaining challenges in this evolving field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.70007
Citations
8
Primary Topic
X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.14

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advances and Challenges of SCAN and r2SCAN Density Functionals in Transition‐Metal Compounds

Jinliang Ning, Bing Xiao, Manish Kothakonda, James W. Furness et al.
8 citations
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science
X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
4.14
article

Advances and Challenges of SCAN and r2SCAN Density Functionals in Transition‐Metal Compounds

Jinliang Ning, Bing Xiao, Manish Kothakonda, James W. Furness, Jianwei Sun, Kanun Pokharel, Akilan Ramasamy, Yubo Zhang, Ruiqi Zhang
article en
8 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Transition‐metal compounds (TMCs) with open‐shell d ‐electrons are characterized by a complex interplay of lattice, charge, orbital, and spin degrees of freedom, giving rise to various fascinating applications. Often exhibiting exotic properties, these compounds are commonly classified as correlated systems due to strong inter‐electronic interactions called Hubbard U . This inherent complexity presents significant challenges to Kohn‐Sham density functional theory (KS‐DFT), the most widely used electronic structure method in condensed matter physics and materials science. While KS‐DFT is, in principle, exact for the ground‐state total energy, its exchange‐correlation energy must be approximated in practice. The mean‐field nature of KS implementations, combined with the limitations of current exchange‐correlation density functional approximations, has led to the perception that DFT is inadequate for correlated systems, particularly TMCs. Consequently, a common workaround involves augmenting DFT with an on‐site Hubbard‐like U correction. In recent years, the strongly constrained and appropriately normed (SCAN) density functional, along with its refined variant r 2 SCAN, has achieved remarkable progress in accurately describing the structural, energetic, electronic, magnetic, and vibrational properties of TMCs, challenging the traditional perception of DFT's limitations. This review explores the design principles of SCAN and r 2 SCAN, highlights their key advancements in studying TMCs, explains the mechanisms driving these improvements, and addresses the remaining challenges in this evolving field.

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular ScienceVol. 15(2)
Tulane University (US), Minjiang University (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Basic Energy Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
4.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.