Evaluation of the economic welfare gains from reducing trade administration costs in Mercosur

This paper evaluates potential welfare gains in the Mercosur region from improvements to trade administration. Streamlined border procedures and related processes could save billions, open markets for exporters, and promote trade diversification. Using a microeconomic model with country-specific trade elasticities, we compare the trade cost structures of Mercosur member states to those of Chile and Canada. The analysis distinguishes between land and sea borders, highlighting cost differences in these trade mediums. A unique case – the Argentinian export tax regime – is examined, revealing welfare losses from this tax that outweigh the benefits of reducing Argentina’s trade costs. Our estimates suggest that if Mercosur’s trade administration costs were reduced to the levels of the reference countries, the region could gain over USD 15 billion annually. This work underscores the substantial economic benefits of improved trade facilitation in the region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Economics
Published
2025-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2025.2480998
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the economic welfare gains from reducing trade administration costs in Mercosur

Glenn P. Jenkins, Mehmet Nazif
Journal of Applied Economics
Global trade and economics
article

Evaluation of the economic welfare gains from reducing trade administration costs in Mercosur

Glenn P. Jenkins, Mehmet Nazif
article en

Abstract

This paper evaluates potential welfare gains in the Mercosur region from improvements to trade administration. Streamlined border procedures and related processes could save billions, open markets for exporters, and promote trade diversification. Using a microeconomic model with country-specific trade elasticities, we compare the trade cost structures of Mercosur member states to those of Chile and Canada. The analysis distinguishes between land and sea borders, highlighting cost differences in these trade mediums. A unique case – the Argentinian export tax regime – is examined, revealing welfare losses from this tax that outweigh the benefits of reducing Argentina’s trade costs. Our estimates suggest that if Mercosur’s trade administration costs were reduced to the levels of the reference countries, the region could gain over USD 15 billion annually. This work underscores the substantial economic benefits of improved trade facilitation in the region.

Journal of Applied EconomicsVol. 28(1)
Queen's University (CA), Eastern Mediterranean University (CY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of the economic welfare gains from reducing trade administration costs in Mercosur — Glenn P. Jenkins, Mehmet Nazif · Journal of Applied Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS