Is sparse local ecological knowledge accurate enough for policy? A seagrass mapping case study from five Greek islands in the Eastern Aegean Sea

The low cost, high applicability and community-based nature of Local Ecological Knowledge (LEK) data for mapping marine benthic habitats has become increasingly popular in recent years. Nonetheless, due to persisting technocratic distrust of LEK often stemming from the unquantifiable nature of bias, the embedding of empirical data at policy levels often lags. Currently, protocols rely on high participation from stakeholders, however, such quotas are often unfeasible, with common limiting factors being the low numbers of knowledgeable individuals in remote parts of the world, and the lack of community trust in the conservation mechanism. In this study, we test whether data from a limited number of interviews with selected artisanal fishers can provide accurate and policy-valuable information as an alternative to high-participation data collection. Our work focuses on the case of Posidonia oceanica seagrass beds around five Greek islands in the eastern Aegean Sea. In comparison with remotely sensed seagrass distribution maps, our results show that the quality of selected LEK data can be exceptionally high (on average 78% accuracy; maximum 92% accuracy), arguing the point that limited-participation LEK should not be discarded as invalid at policy levels. Furthermore, the way LEK is recorded, as well as the number of years of fishing experience of the participants, were found to significantly affect the quality of data being delivered. Lastly, we show that LEK outperformed the governmentally-issued seagrass map, thus providing further evidence of fishers’ LEK ability to deliver policy-relevant data regarding the distribution of their local marine habitats. • Evaluated low-participation fishers Local Ecological Knowledge for seagrass mapping. • Results indicate a mean accuracy of ∼78% (max 92%) against remotely sensed data. • Empirical data outperformed official governmental seagrass maps against remotely sensed data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ocean & Coastal Management
Published
2025-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107627
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Marine and coastal plant biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is sparse local ecological knowledge accurate enough for policy? A seagrass mapping case study from five Greek islands in the Eastern Aegean Sea

Tim J. Grandjean, Anastasia Miliou, Konstantinos Alexopoulos, Theodoros Tsimpidis et al.
3 citations
Ocean & Coastal Management
Marine and coastal plant biology
5.38
article

Is sparse local ecological knowledge accurate enough for policy? A seagrass mapping case study from five Greek islands in the Eastern Aegean Sea

Tim J. Grandjean, Anastasia Miliou, Konstantinos Alexopoulos, Theodoros Tsimpidis, Abigail McQuatters‐Gollop
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The low cost, high applicability and community-based nature of Local Ecological Knowledge (LEK) data for mapping marine benthic habitats has become increasingly popular in recent years. Nonetheless, due to persisting technocratic distrust of LEK often stemming from the unquantifiable nature of bias, the embedding of empirical data at policy levels often lags. Currently, protocols rely on high participation from stakeholders, however, such quotas are often unfeasible, with common limiting factors being the low numbers of knowledgeable individuals in remote parts of the world, and the lack of community trust in the conservation mechanism. In this study, we test whether data from a limited number of interviews with selected artisanal fishers can provide accurate and policy-valuable information as an alternative to high-participation data collection. Our work focuses on the case of Posidonia oceanica seagrass beds around five Greek islands in the eastern Aegean Sea. In comparison with remotely sensed seagrass distribution maps, our results show that the quality of selected LEK data can be exceptionally high (on average 78% accuracy; maximum 92% accuracy), arguing the point that limited-participation LEK should not be discarded as invalid at policy levels. Furthermore, the way LEK is recorded, as well as the number of years of fishing experience of the participants, were found to significantly affect the quality of data being delivered. Lastly, we show that LEK outperformed the governmentally-issued seagrass map, thus providing further evidence of fishers’ LEK ability to deliver policy-relevant data regarding the distribution of their local marine habitats. • Evaluated low-participation fishers Local Ecological Knowledge for seagrass mapping. • Results indicate a mean accuracy of ∼78% (max 92%) against remotely sensed data. • Empirical data outperformed official governmental seagrass maps against remotely sensed data.

Ocean & Coastal ManagementVol. 267
Marine Conservation Institute (US), Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (GB), Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NL), University of Plymouth (GB)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Marine and coastal plant biology
5.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.