Evaluating the Quality and Reliability of <scp>YouTube</scp> Videos on Optic Neuritis: A Cross‐Sectional Study Using Validated Scoring Systems

The overall quality of the videos was suboptimal. Videos created by physicians demonstrated higher quality based on JAMA and GQS scores, highlighting the importance of expert authorship in online health content. The video metrics did not correlate with quality, highlighting the need for reliable evaluation criteria beyond the popularity measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.14527
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Optic Neuritis: A Cross‐Sectional Study Using Validated Scoring Systems

Bedia Kesimal, Sücattin İlker Kocamış, Sıdıka Gerçeker Demircan
7 citations
Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
19.71
article

Evaluating the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Optic Neuritis: A Cross‐Sectional Study Using Validated Scoring Systems

Bedia Kesimal, Sücattin İlker Kocamış, Sıdıka Gerçeker Demircan
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The overall quality of the videos was suboptimal. Videos created by physicians demonstrated higher quality based on JAMA and GQS scores, highlighting the importance of expert authorship in online health content. The video metrics did not correlate with quality, highlighting the need for reliable evaluation criteria beyond the popularity measures.

Clinical and Experimental OphthalmologyVol. 53(6)
Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
19.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.