Comparative feasibility of lithium extraction technologies in U.S. oilfields

The increasing demand for lithium, driven by the expansion of electric vehicle (EV) markets and energy storage solutions, has emphasized the need for sustainable lithium extraction methods. Produced water from oil and gas operations presents a promising domestic lithium source, potentially reducing dependence on conventional sources such as salt lakes and hard rock mining. This study evaluates different lithium extraction technologies from U.S. oilfileds, including adsorption, chemical precipitation, solvent extraction, electrochemical methods, and membranes. Adsorption, chemical precipitation, and solvent extraction emerged as the most practical methods for lithium recovery from produced water, based on efficiency, environmental impact, and cost. Adsorption has shown significant promise for low-lithium concentrations found in oilfield brines, such as those from the Bakken and Delaware Basin, due to its selective nature and moderate environmental impact, making it a viable option for further development. Chemical precipitation was more efficient for high-lithium-concentration sources, such as those found in the Smackover Formation and Fox Creek. However, challenges such as adsorbent regeneration, competing ion selectivity, and potential environmental impacts of chemical precipitation still require further investigation. This study also underscores the economic and environmental benefits of using produced water as a lithium source, potentially contributing to oilfield sustainability through resource recycling and reducing freshwater demand in hydraulic fracturing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Desalination and Water Treatment
Published
2025-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dwt.2025.101128
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative feasibility of lithium extraction technologies in U.S. oilfields

Olusegun Stanley Tomomewo, Yeo Howe Lim, Mohammad Abdullah Almubaidin, Ali Alshami et al.
9 citations
Desalination and Water Treatment
Extraction and Separation Processes
6.42
article

Comparative feasibility of lithium extraction technologies in U.S. oilfields

Olusegun Stanley Tomomewo, Yeo Howe Lim, Mohammad Abdullah Almubaidin, Ali Alshami, Mousa Almousa, H. Ezzat Khalifa, Ban H. Al-Tayyem
article en
9 citations

Abstract

The increasing demand for lithium, driven by the expansion of electric vehicle (EV) markets and energy storage solutions, has emphasized the need for sustainable lithium extraction methods. Produced water from oil and gas operations presents a promising domestic lithium source, potentially reducing dependence on conventional sources such as salt lakes and hard rock mining. This study evaluates different lithium extraction technologies from U.S. oilfileds, including adsorption, chemical precipitation, solvent extraction, electrochemical methods, and membranes. Adsorption, chemical precipitation, and solvent extraction emerged as the most practical methods for lithium recovery from produced water, based on efficiency, environmental impact, and cost. Adsorption has shown significant promise for low-lithium concentrations found in oilfield brines, such as those from the Bakken and Delaware Basin, due to its selective nature and moderate environmental impact, making it a viable option for further development. Chemical precipitation was more efficient for high-lithium-concentration sources, such as those found in the Smackover Formation and Fox Creek. However, challenges such as adsorbent regeneration, competing ion selectivity, and potential environmental impacts of chemical precipitation still require further investigation. This study also underscores the economic and environmental benefits of using produced water as a lithium source, potentially contributing to oilfield sustainability through resource recycling and reducing freshwater demand in hydraulic fracturing.

Desalination and Water TreatmentVol. 322
South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (US), University of North Dakota (US), Department of Mines and Petroleum (AU), University of Petroleum (ID), Japan Petroleum Energy Center (JP)
University of North Dakota
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Extraction and Separation Processes
6.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.