Provably Unlearnable Data Examples

The exploitation of publicly accessible data has led to escalating concerns regarding data privacy and intellectual property (IP) breaches in the age of artificial intelligence.To safeguard both data privacy and IP-related domain knowledge, efforts have been undertaken to render shared data unlearnable for unauthorized models in the wild.Existing methods apply empirically optimized perturbations to the data in the hope of disrupting the correlation between the inputs and the corresponding labels such that the data samples are converted into Unlearnable Examples (UEs).Nevertheless, the absence of mechanisms to verify the robustness of UEs against uncertainty in unauthorized models and their training procedures engenders several under-explored challenges.First, it is hard to quantify the unlearnability of UEs against unauthorized adversaries from different runs of training, leaving the soundness of the defense in obscurity.Particularly, as a prevailing evaluation metric, empirical test accuracy faces generalization errors and may not plausibly represent the quality of UEs.This also leaves room for attackers, as there is no rigid guarantee of the maximal test accuracy achievable by attackers.Furthermore, we find that a simple recovery attack can restore the clean-task performance of the classifiers trained on UEs by slightly perturbing the learned weights.To mitigate the aforementioned problems, in this paper, we propose a mechanism for certifying the so-called (q, )-Learnability of an unlearnable dataset via parametric smoothing.A lower certified (q, )-Learnability indicates a more robust and effective protection over the dataset.Concretely, we 1) improve the tightness of certified (q, )-Learnability and 2) design Provably Unlearnable Examples (PUEs) which have reduced (q, )-Learnability.According to experimental results, PUEs demonstrate both decreased certified (q, )-Learnability and enhanced empirical robustness compared to existing UEs.Compared to the competitors on classifiers with uncertainty in parameters, PUEs reduce at most 18.9% of certified (q, )-Learnability on ImageNet and 54.4% of the empirical test accuracy score on CIFAR-100.Our source code is available at https://github.com/NeuralSec/certified-data-learnability.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14722/ndss.2025.240886
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Data Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Provably Unlearnable Data Examples

Minhui Xue, Derui Wang, Liming Zhu, Bo Li et al.
1 citations
Machine Learning and Data Classification
2.48
article

Provably Unlearnable Data Examples

Minhui Xue, Derui Wang, Liming Zhu, Bo Li, Seyit Camtepe
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The exploitation of publicly accessible data has led to escalating concerns regarding data privacy and intellectual property (IP) breaches in the age of artificial intelligence.To safeguard both data privacy and IP-related domain knowledge, efforts have been undertaken to render shared data unlearnable for unauthorized models in the wild.Existing methods apply empirically optimized perturbations to the data in the hope of disrupting the correlation between the inputs and the corresponding labels such that the data samples are converted into Unlearnable Examples (UEs).Nevertheless, the absence of mechanisms to verify the robustness of UEs against uncertainty in unauthorized models and their training procedures engenders several under-explored challenges.First, it is hard to quantify the unlearnability of UEs against unauthorized adversaries from different runs of training, leaving the soundness of the defense in obscurity.Particularly, as a prevailing evaluation metric, empirical test accuracy faces generalization errors and may not plausibly represent the quality of UEs.This also leaves room for attackers, as there is no rigid guarantee of the maximal test accuracy achievable by attackers.Furthermore, we find that a simple recovery attack can restore the clean-task performance of the classifiers trained on UEs by slightly perturbing the learned weights.To mitigate the aforementioned problems, in this paper, we propose a mechanism for certifying the so-called (q, )-Learnability of an unlearnable dataset via parametric smoothing.A lower certified (q, )-Learnability indicates a more robust and effective protection over the dataset.Concretely, we 1) improve the tightness of certified (q, )-Learnability and 2) design Provably Unlearnable Examples (PUEs) which have reduced (q, )-Learnability.According to experimental results, PUEs demonstrate both decreased certified (q, )-Learnability and enhanced empirical robustness compared to existing UEs.Compared to the competitors on classifiers with uncertainty in parameters, PUEs reduce at most 18.9% of certified (q, )-Learnability on ImageNet and 54.4% of the empirical test accuracy score on CIFAR-100.Our source code is available at https://github.com/NeuralSec/certified-data-learnability.

National Science Foundation, Australian Government, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Machine Learning and Data Classification
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.