Impact Tracing: Identifying the Culprit of Misinformation in Encrypted Messaging Systems

Encrypted messaging systems obstruct content moderation, although they provide end-to-end security.As a result, misinformation proliferates in these systems, thereby exacerbating online hate and harassment.The paradigm of "Reporting-then-Tracing" shows great potential in mitigating the spread of misinformation.For instance, message traceback (CCS'19) traces all the dissemination paths of a message, while source tracing (CCS'21) traces its originator.However, message traceback lacks privacy preservation for non-influential users (e.g., users who only receive the message once), while source tracing maintains privacy but only provides limited traceability.In this paper, we initiate the study of impact tracing.Intuitively, impact tracing traces influential spreaders central to disseminating misinformation while providing privacy protection for non-influential users.We introduce noises to hide noninfluential users and demonstrate that these noises do not hinder the identification of influential spreaders.Then, we formally prove our scheme's security and show it achieves differential privacy protection for non-influential users.Additionally, we define three metrics to evaluate its traceability, correctness, and privacy using real-world datasets.The experimental results show that our scheme identifies the most influential spreaders with accuracy from 82% to 99% as the amount of noise varies.Meanwhile, our scheme requires only a 6-byte platform storage overhead for each message while maintaining a low messaging latency (< 0.25ms).

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14722/ndss.2025.240980
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spam and Phishing Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact Tracing: Identifying the Culprit of Misinformation in Encrypted Messaging Systems

Robert H. Deng, Xiaoguo Li, Biwen Chen, Chuan Ma et al.
1 citations
Spam and Phishing Detection
3.25
article

Impact Tracing: Identifying the Culprit of Misinformation in Encrypted Messaging Systems

Robert H. Deng, Xiaoguo Li, Biwen Chen, Chuan Ma, Guomin Yang, Zhongming Wang, Tao Xiang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Encrypted messaging systems obstruct content moderation, although they provide end-to-end security.As a result, misinformation proliferates in these systems, thereby exacerbating online hate and harassment.The paradigm of "Reporting-then-Tracing" shows great potential in mitigating the spread of misinformation.For instance, message traceback (CCS'19) traces all the dissemination paths of a message, while source tracing (CCS'21) traces its originator.However, message traceback lacks privacy preservation for non-influential users (e.g., users who only receive the message once), while source tracing maintains privacy but only provides limited traceability.In this paper, we initiate the study of impact tracing.Intuitively, impact tracing traces influential spreaders central to disseminating misinformation while providing privacy protection for non-influential users.We introduce noises to hide noninfluential users and demonstrate that these noises do not hinder the identification of influential spreaders.Then, we formally prove our scheme's security and show it achieves differential privacy protection for non-influential users.Additionally, we define three metrics to evaluate its traceability, correctness, and privacy using real-world datasets.The experimental results show that our scheme identifies the most influential spreaders with accuracy from 82% to 99% as the amount of noise varies.Meanwhile, our scheme requires only a 6-byte platform storage overhead for each message while maintaining a low messaging latency (< 0.25ms).

National Natural Science Foundation of China, AXA Research Fund, Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, Centre Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment, Singapore Management University
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Spam and Phishing Detection
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.