Bargaining With ‘Reproductive Capital’: Multilayered Stratified Reproduction in the Case of Taiwanese Gay Men Seeking Transnational Surrogacy

Scholars in the field of social studies of reproduction have recently turned their attention to the booming cross-border reproductive industry. In the case of gay men seeking donor ova and surrogacy to become fathers, there are issues of uneven accessibility and disparity between privileged intended gay fathers and comparatively less affluent women who offer reproductive labour. Despite being the first country in Asia to legalise same-sex marriage, Taiwan still holds back on LGBTQ+ reproductive rights. This compels intended queer parents to travel abroad for assisted reproduction. This article draws on 53 in-depth interviews with Taiwanese gay men seeking transnational surrogacy. Adopting a Bourdieusian perspective, I examine how they 'bargained with' economic, social, cultural and symbolic capital to achieve reproductive goals at the intersections of sexuality, nationality, race and sociolegal constraints. When it comes to multilayered stratified reproduction, my findings highlight disparities between (1) heterosexuals and LGBTQ+ people, (2) intended gay fathers and (3) gay fathers and surrogates. This article enriches our understanding of stratified reproduction, transnational surrogacy and queer reproductive justice by introducing the concept of 'reproductive capital' that was strategically accumulated and mobilised by gay fathers in order to navigate the complex multilayered reproductive stratifications in transnational reproduction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology of Health & Illness
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.70019
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bargaining With ‘Reproductive Capital’: Multilayered Stratified Reproduction in the Case of Taiwanese Gay Men Seeking Transnational Surrogacy

Jung Chen
3 citations
Sociology of Health & Illness
Reproductive Health and Technologies
5.09
article

Bargaining With ‘Reproductive Capital’: Multilayered Stratified Reproduction in the Case of Taiwanese Gay Men Seeking Transnational Surrogacy

Jung Chen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Scholars in the field of social studies of reproduction have recently turned their attention to the booming cross-border reproductive industry. In the case of gay men seeking donor ova and surrogacy to become fathers, there are issues of uneven accessibility and disparity between privileged intended gay fathers and comparatively less affluent women who offer reproductive labour. Despite being the first country in Asia to legalise same-sex marriage, Taiwan still holds back on LGBTQ+ reproductive rights. This compels intended queer parents to travel abroad for assisted reproduction. This article draws on 53 in-depth interviews with Taiwanese gay men seeking transnational surrogacy. Adopting a Bourdieusian perspective, I examine how they 'bargained with' economic, social, cultural and symbolic capital to achieve reproductive goals at the intersections of sexuality, nationality, race and sociolegal constraints. When it comes to multilayered stratified reproduction, my findings highlight disparities between (1) heterosexuals and LGBTQ+ people, (2) intended gay fathers and (3) gay fathers and surrogates. This article enriches our understanding of stratified reproduction, transnational surrogacy and queer reproductive justice by introducing the concept of 'reproductive capital' that was strategically accumulated and mobilised by gay fathers in order to navigate the complex multilayered reproductive stratifications in transnational reproduction.

Sociology of Health & IllnessVol. 47(3)
Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica (TW)
Academia Sinica, Cambridge Trust
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
5.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.