Cash Subsidies for the Poor: Evaluating Thailand's State Welfare Card Programme

ABSTRACT This paper examines the causal effects of Thailand's 2017 large‐scale unconditional cash transfer programme (‘the state welfare card programme’) that covered over 20% of the country's population. The study uses regression discontinuity methods and data from the 2019 nationally representative household socio‐economic survey. Results show that this programme had no significant impact on consumption expenditure and food expenditure, as intended. However, the programme caused a significant increase in non‐consumption expenditure, especially items paid for in cash. Also, the programme significantly increased in‐kind consumption expenditure, demonstrating the payment modality of the programme. Given a large evidence base showing the poverty‐reducing effects of cash transfer programmes in developing countries, the findings point to the need to revamp the programme at both design and implementation stages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian-Pacific Economic Literature
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/apel.12452
Primary Topic
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cash Subsidies for the Poor: Evaluating Thailand's State Welfare Card Programme

Wannaphong Durongkaveroj
Asian-Pacific Economic Literature
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
article

Cash Subsidies for the Poor: Evaluating Thailand's State Welfare Card Programme

Wannaphong Durongkaveroj
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines the causal effects of Thailand's 2017 large‐scale unconditional cash transfer programme (‘the state welfare card programme’) that covered over 20% of the country's population. The study uses regression discontinuity methods and data from the 2019 nationally representative household socio‐economic survey. Results show that this programme had no significant impact on consumption expenditure and food expenditure, as intended. However, the programme caused a significant increase in non‐consumption expenditure, especially items paid for in cash. Also, the programme significantly increased in‐kind consumption expenditure, demonstrating the payment modality of the programme. Given a large evidence base showing the poverty‐reducing effects of cash transfer programmes in developing countries, the findings point to the need to revamp the programme at both design and implementation stages.

Asian-Pacific Economic LiteratureVol. 39(2)
Ramkhamhaeng University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.