Ethnic and gender disparities in U.S. agriculture: An analysis of technology and technical efficiency differentials

Abstract We explore ethnic and gender disparities in U.S. agriculture by comparing productivity gaps between male‐ and female‐headed family farms, and between non‐Hispanic White and minority‐headed family farms. Using Agricultural Resource Management Survey data from 2017 to 2020, propensity score matching techniques are applied to obtain comparable samples based on observable covariates. Statistical tests reveal structural differences in production technologies between male‐ and female‐headed farms, and between non‐Hispanic White and minority‐headed farms, thus requiring the estimation of separate production technologies for each group. Accordingly, a stochastic metafrontier framework is used to envelop the group frontiers and assess technology gaps. The results indicate that female and minority‐principal operators not only use different production technologies but are also less proficient at combining inputs to maximize farm output. The results also reveal within‐group gender and ethnic differences—ceteris paribus, among non‐Hispanic White and minority‐led farms, female producers generated substantially less output compared to their male counterparts. Similarly, among male principal operators, Hispanic producers generated more output compared to their non‐Hispanic White and non‐Hispanic non‐White counterparts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12539
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethnic and gender disparities in U.S. agriculture: An analysis of technology and technical efficiency differentials

Nigel Key, Boris E. Bravo‐Ureta, Eric Njuki, Michée A. Lachaud
1 citations
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
4.83
article

Ethnic and gender disparities in U.S. agriculture: An analysis of technology and technical efficiency differentials

Nigel Key, Boris E. Bravo‐Ureta, Eric Njuki, Michée A. Lachaud
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract We explore ethnic and gender disparities in U.S. agriculture by comparing productivity gaps between male‐ and female‐headed family farms, and between non‐Hispanic White and minority‐headed family farms. Using Agricultural Resource Management Survey data from 2017 to 2020, propensity score matching techniques are applied to obtain comparable samples based on observable covariates. Statistical tests reveal structural differences in production technologies between male‐ and female‐headed farms, and between non‐Hispanic White and minority‐headed farms, thus requiring the estimation of separate production technologies for each group. Accordingly, a stochastic metafrontier framework is used to envelop the group frontiers and assess technology gaps. The results indicate that female and minority‐principal operators not only use different production technologies but are also less proficient at combining inputs to maximize farm output. The results also reveal within‐group gender and ethnic differences—ceteris paribus, among non‐Hispanic White and minority‐led farms, female producers generated substantially less output compared to their male counterparts. Similarly, among male principal operators, Hispanic producers generated more output compared to their non‐Hispanic White and non‐Hispanic non‐White counterparts.

American Journal of Agricultural EconomicsVol. 107(4)
Economic Research Service (US), University of Connecticut (US), Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
4.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.