Fighting-related injuries do not affect mate choice in the giant mesquite bug, <i>Pachylis neocalifornicus</i>

Females often choose high-quality mates as they may confer benefits to the female. One way male quality may decline is due to the injuries that they can acquire during male-male combat. Females might assess males based on injury since injuries place energic demands on the body that could reduce their reproductive output. Thus, females might make mating decisions based on whether males have acquired these fighting-related injuries. Here, we tested this injury-mediated female mate choice hypothesis using the giant mesquite bug, <i>Pachylis neocalifornicus</i> (Hemiptera: Coreidae). This hypothesis predicts that females will choose uninjured males over injured males. We simulated non-lethal injuries that males could acquire during male-male contests and assayed mate choice. We compared mate choice of the injury group to a control group and found that fighting-related injuries did not affect mate choice. However, females were more likely to mate with males that had large sexually selected weapons while males were more likely to make mating attempts with large-bodied females. Additionally, the smaller a male's weaponry the more quickly they initiated their mating attempts. Our results do not support the injury-mediated mate choice hypothesis. Instead, they reveal that other factors besides fighting-related injuries appear to have a larger role in determining mating behavior patterns in this species.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Ecology
Published
2025-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/araf024
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hemiptera Insect Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fighting-related injuries do not affect mate choice in the giant mesquite bug, Pachylis neocalifornicus

John H. Swanson, Lauren A. Cirino, Zachary Emberts, Isaac McEvoy
1 citations
Behavioral Ecology
Hemiptera Insect Studies
3.03
article

Fighting-related injuries do not affect mate choice in the giant mesquite bug, Pachylis neocalifornicus

John H. Swanson, Lauren A. Cirino, Zachary Emberts, Isaac McEvoy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Females often choose high-quality mates as they may confer benefits to the female. One way male quality may decline is due to the injuries that they can acquire during male-male combat. Females might assess males based on injury since injuries place energic demands on the body that could reduce their reproductive output. Thus, females might make mating decisions based on whether males have acquired these fighting-related injuries. Here, we tested this injury-mediated female mate choice hypothesis using the giant mesquite bug, <i>Pachylis neocalifornicus</i> (Hemiptera: Coreidae). This hypothesis predicts that females will choose uninjured males over injured males. We simulated non-lethal injuries that males could acquire during male-male contests and assayed mate choice. We compared mate choice of the injury group to a control group and found that fighting-related injuries did not affect mate choice. However, females were more likely to mate with males that had large sexually selected weapons while males were more likely to make mating attempts with large-bodied females. Additionally, the smaller a male's weaponry the more quickly they initiated their mating attempts. Our results do not support the injury-mediated mate choice hypothesis. Instead, they reveal that other factors besides fighting-related injuries appear to have a larger role in determining mating behavior patterns in this species.

Behavioral EcologyVol. 36(4)
Oklahoma State University (US), University of Mary Washington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Hemiptera Insect Studies
3.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.