Geography of tiny house villages for the homeless (revisited): implications for planning and policy in the United States

Abstract The increasing adoption of tiny house villages as a solution to homelessness in the United States (US) underscores the need for comprehensive tracking and documentation of their locations, physical attributes, and social characteristics. This is vital to understanding the growing trend of addressing homelessness with tiny house villages, while providing advocates and policymakers with the information needed to optimize outcomes, and ensure these initiatives truly benefit the homeless population. While initial efforts were made in 2019 to establish a database for these villages, this study represents an improvement by presenting an updated database that reflects the growing popularity of tiny house villages for the homeless. Building upon the 2019 database, the study introduces new categories, such as the funding sources (private, public, or both), and the permissibility of pets in these villages. The study employs a mixed-method approach, gathering primary data through email and phone interviews, complemented by data obtained from online sources, including websites and social media platforms like Facebook. The study’s findings reveal critical implications for planning, policy, and community well-being. Notably, the proliferation of operational tiny house villages underscores their growing acceptance as a viable solution to homelessness. These villages increasingly prioritize not only housing but also comprehensive support services, including mental health and basic medical care. However, only 19% were found to receive sole public funding, compared to the majority (43%) that depend solely on private funds. Additionally, recognizing pets as family companions within these villages is often essential for residents’ emotional well-being. By addressing the policy and planning implications of the study’s findings, advocates can create housing solutions for homeless populations, contributing to a more socially sustainable and inclusive society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-025-10197-y
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Homelessness and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geography of tiny house villages for the homeless (revisited): implications for planning and policy in the United States

Krista Evans, Yetimoni Kpeebi
7 citations
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment
Homelessness and Social Issues
19.71
article

Geography of tiny house villages for the homeless (revisited): implications for planning and policy in the United States

Krista Evans, Yetimoni Kpeebi
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract The increasing adoption of tiny house villages as a solution to homelessness in the United States (US) underscores the need for comprehensive tracking and documentation of their locations, physical attributes, and social characteristics. This is vital to understanding the growing trend of addressing homelessness with tiny house villages, while providing advocates and policymakers with the information needed to optimize outcomes, and ensure these initiatives truly benefit the homeless population. While initial efforts were made in 2019 to establish a database for these villages, this study represents an improvement by presenting an updated database that reflects the growing popularity of tiny house villages for the homeless. Building upon the 2019 database, the study introduces new categories, such as the funding sources (private, public, or both), and the permissibility of pets in these villages. The study employs a mixed-method approach, gathering primary data through email and phone interviews, complemented by data obtained from online sources, including websites and social media platforms like Facebook. The study’s findings reveal critical implications for planning, policy, and community well-being. Notably, the proliferation of operational tiny house villages underscores their growing acceptance as a viable solution to homelessness. These villages increasingly prioritize not only housing but also comprehensive support services, including mental health and basic medical care. However, only 19% were found to receive sole public funding, compared to the majority (43%) that depend solely on private funds. Additionally, recognizing pets as family companions within these villages is often essential for residents’ emotional well-being. By addressing the policy and planning implications of the study’s findings, advocates can create housing solutions for homeless populations, contributing to a more socially sustainable and inclusive society.

Journal of Housing and the Built EnvironmentVol. 40(3)
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US), Missouri State University (US)
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Homelessness and Social Issues
19.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.