‘I am not an anti‐vaxxer’: Women's Diverging Representations of <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 Vaccination and Pregnancy

ABSTRACT Despite a disproportionate risk of harm from contracting COVID‐19, pregnant women in Australia are reluctant to vaccinate. Drawing from social representations theory, this study investigated lay knowledge associated with women, pregnancy and COVID‐19 vaccination towards the end of the pandemic. Women in regional New South Wales ( N = 103; M age = 39.76) completed an online survey comprising risk/benefit scales and a word association task. Results revealed that pregnant women and women considering pregnancy perceived ‘pregnant women’ as being at high risk from the COVID‐19 virus and AstraZeneca vaccine. Regardless of pregnancy status, patterns in women's perceived risk of the virus and vaccines differed by vaccination status and reasoning. Risk and pregnancy issues frequently co‐occurred in women's associations. However, the meaning of these associations varied in relation to women's vaccination experiences. Conceptualised as ‘thema’ risk/safety was central to a social representational field elaborated among women. Aspects of the representational field were elicited depending on self/other relations and diverging emancipated and polemic representations in response to institutional messaging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.70088
Primary Topic
Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘I am not an anti‐vaxxer’: Women's Diverging Representations of COVID‐19 Vaccination and Pregnancy

Marie Hutchinson, Gail Moloney, Shayleigh Walker‐Jones
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
article

‘I am not an anti‐vaxxer’: Women's Diverging Representations of COVID‐19 Vaccination and Pregnancy

Marie Hutchinson, Gail Moloney, Shayleigh Walker‐Jones
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite a disproportionate risk of harm from contracting COVID‐19, pregnant women in Australia are reluctant to vaccinate. Drawing from social representations theory, this study investigated lay knowledge associated with women, pregnancy and COVID‐19 vaccination towards the end of the pandemic. Women in regional New South Wales ( N = 103; M age = 39.76) completed an online survey comprising risk/benefit scales and a word association task. Results revealed that pregnant women and women considering pregnancy perceived ‘pregnant women’ as being at high risk from the COVID‐19 virus and AstraZeneca vaccine. Regardless of pregnancy status, patterns in women's perceived risk of the virus and vaccines differed by vaccination status and reasoning. Risk and pregnancy issues frequently co‐occurred in women's associations. However, the meaning of these associations varied in relation to women's vaccination experiences. Conceptualised as ‘thema’ risk/safety was central to a social representational field elaborated among women. Aspects of the representational field were elicited depending on self/other relations and diverging emancipated and polemic representations in response to institutional messaging.

Journal of Community & Applied Social PsychologyVol. 35(2)
Southern Cross University (AU)
Southern Cross University
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.