Evaluating ChatGPT on Korea's BIM Expertise Exam and improving its performance through RAG

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4’s understanding of the building information modelling (BIM) knowledge domain by testing on the multiple-choice section of Korea's BIM Expertise Exam (KBEE), a professional license exam tailored for BIM. ChatGPT-4 achieved passing scores across all tested years and averaged 85%, 20% higher than its predecessor. Nevertheless, ChatGPT-4 had difficulty in certain areas including the ‘BIM guidelines’ subcategory, as the problems required access to documents specific to Korea's BIM policies and stipulations. By supplying the required documents using Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), GPT-4’s score further improved to 88.6%, an improvement of 25.7%. The results provide evidence that ChatGPT-4, albeit within the context of the KBEE, is overall knowledgeable in its understanding of the BIM domain. The results of RAG demonstrate that partial gaps in its knowledge can be bolstered by providing the appropriate documents. The study verified that this capability was particularly valuable for categories that varied depending on local and regional contexts. The findings suggest that ChatGPT, when integrated with RAG, holds significant potential as a comprehensive and adaptive knowledge model in the BIM domain, and thereby alleviates the barriers for BIM adoption, such as the lack of experts, the cost of training, complexity of the BIM models, and additional workloads required during the BIM delivery process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computational Design and Engineering
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jcde/qwaf033
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating ChatGPT on Korea's BIM Expertise Exam and improving its performance through RAG

Wonbok Lee, S.K. Kim, Youngsu Yu, Bonsang Koo
3 citations
Journal of Computational Design and Engineering
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
article

Evaluating ChatGPT on Korea's BIM Expertise Exam and improving its performance through RAG

Wonbok Lee, S.K. Kim, Youngsu Yu, Bonsang Koo
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4’s understanding of the building information modelling (BIM) knowledge domain by testing on the multiple-choice section of Korea's BIM Expertise Exam (KBEE), a professional license exam tailored for BIM. ChatGPT-4 achieved passing scores across all tested years and averaged 85%, 20% higher than its predecessor. Nevertheless, ChatGPT-4 had difficulty in certain areas including the ‘BIM guidelines’ subcategory, as the problems required access to documents specific to Korea's BIM policies and stipulations. By supplying the required documents using Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), GPT-4’s score further improved to 88.6%, an improvement of 25.7%. The results provide evidence that ChatGPT-4, albeit within the context of the KBEE, is overall knowledgeable in its understanding of the BIM domain. The results of RAG demonstrate that partial gaps in its knowledge can be bolstered by providing the appropriate documents. The study verified that this capability was particularly valuable for categories that varied depending on local and regional contexts. The findings suggest that ChatGPT, when integrated with RAG, holds significant potential as a comprehensive and adaptive knowledge model in the BIM domain, and thereby alleviates the barriers for BIM adoption, such as the lack of experts, the cost of training, complexity of the BIM models, and additional workloads required during the BIM delivery process.

Journal of Computational Design and EngineeringVol. 12(4)
Seoul National University of Science and Technology (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.