Black men's intimate partner violence victimization and help‐seeking experiences: Integrating and applying intersectionality and hegemonic masculinity

Abstract Many theories have been applied to understanding varied experiences of intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization, IPV‐related help‐seeking, and barriers to help‐seeking, including intersectionality theory to describe the influence of multiple systems of oppression on IPV victimization and help‐seeking. Although theorizing on IPV has historically focused on violence against women, more attention has been paid in recent years to men's IPV victimization and help‐seeking experiences. However, much of this literature is anti‐feminist and does not account for the impact of race and racism on men's experiences. Some researchers go as far as to blame feminism for the barriers that men face when seeking help and ignore the influence of White‐supremacist patriarchal systems on the men under study. The focus of this paper is Black men, as their IPV victimization experiences are rarely empirically accounted for, though they do experience IPV victimization. By applying intersectionality and hegemonic masculinities to this sparse body of literature, we aim to illuminate the conundrums Black men face when victimized and making help‐seeking decisions in the context of patriarchy and White supremacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Family Theory & Review
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12619
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Black men's intimate partner violence victimization and help‐seeking experiences: Integrating and applying intersectionality and hegemonic masculinity

Megan L. Haselschwerdt, Meagan A. Stewart
2 citations
Journal of Family Theory & Review
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
4.33
article

Black men's intimate partner violence victimization and help‐seeking experiences: Integrating and applying intersectionality and hegemonic masculinity

Megan L. Haselschwerdt, Meagan A. Stewart
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Many theories have been applied to understanding varied experiences of intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization, IPV‐related help‐seeking, and barriers to help‐seeking, including intersectionality theory to describe the influence of multiple systems of oppression on IPV victimization and help‐seeking. Although theorizing on IPV has historically focused on violence against women, more attention has been paid in recent years to men's IPV victimization and help‐seeking experiences. However, much of this literature is anti‐feminist and does not account for the impact of race and racism on men's experiences. Some researchers go as far as to blame feminism for the barriers that men face when seeking help and ignore the influence of White‐supremacist patriarchal systems on the men under study. The focus of this paper is Black men, as their IPV victimization experiences are rarely empirically accounted for, though they do experience IPV victimization. By applying intersectionality and hegemonic masculinities to this sparse body of literature, we aim to illuminate the conundrums Black men face when victimized and making help‐seeking decisions in the context of patriarchy and White supremacy.

Journal of Family Theory & ReviewVol. 17(4)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
4.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.