The Mixed Gamble of Competitive Dynamics in Family‐Controlled Firms

Abstract We extend the mixed gamble perspective to explain how family‐controlled firms frame and evaluate the difficult trade‐off between potential gains and losses in financial wealth (FW) and socioemotional wealth (SEW) when pursuing portfolio‐level strategic initiatives, as captured by competitive aggressiveness and complexity. Analyzing 570 public‐listed Korean firms from 1998 to 2017, we find that family‐controlled firms tend to avoid competitive aggressiveness and complexity in their strategic action portfolios. However, our broader perspective leads us to identify critical boundary conditions: this reluctance weakens when firms fall below historical and social performance aspiration levels, as the risks to FW and SEW become more apparent. Conversely, their reluctance strengthens when they retain many family business group affiliations that provide safeguards for FW and SEW.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management Studies
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13218
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Family Business Performance and Succession
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Mixed Gamble of Competitive Dynamics in Family‐Controlled Firms

Josip Kotlar, Alfredo De Massis, Jaeyoung Cho
5 citations
Journal of Management Studies
Family Business Performance and Succession
13.82
article

The Mixed Gamble of Competitive Dynamics in Family‐Controlled Firms

Josip Kotlar, Alfredo De Massis, Jaeyoung Cho
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract We extend the mixed gamble perspective to explain how family‐controlled firms frame and evaluate the difficult trade‐off between potential gains and losses in financial wealth (FW) and socioemotional wealth (SEW) when pursuing portfolio‐level strategic initiatives, as captured by competitive aggressiveness and complexity. Analyzing 570 public‐listed Korean firms from 1998 to 2017, we find that family‐controlled firms tend to avoid competitive aggressiveness and complexity in their strategic action portfolios. However, our broader perspective leads us to identify critical boundary conditions: this reluctance weakens when firms fall below historical and social performance aspiration levels, as the risks to FW and SEW become more apparent. Conversely, their reluctance strengthens when they retain many family business group affiliations that provide safeguards for FW and SEW.

Journal of Management Studies
University of Chieti-Pescara (IT), University of Wollongong in Dubai (AE), Lancaster University (GB), Zhejiang University (CN), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Family Business Performance and Succession
13.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Mixed Gamble of Competitive Dynamics in Family‐Controlled Firms — Josip Kotlar, Alfredo De Massis, et al. · Journal of Management Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS