Physicochemical, Morphological, and Digestibility Properties of Round and Wrinkled Pea Starches

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives Pea protein isolation results in a significant amount of starch‐rich byproduct. Efficient utilization of this byproduct can be crucial for economic feasibility of protein isolation process. In this study, we examined the physicochemical, morphological, and digestibility properties of starches derived from round and wrinkled peas grown across three locations (Pullman, WA; Richland, MT; and Sidney, MT) in 2023. Findings Our findings showed that wrinkled pea flour had higher protein, but lower starch concentration compared to round pea flour. The starch from wrinkled peas contained a higher amylose concentration than that from round peas (60% vs. 29%). When subjected to a Rapid Visco Analyzer (RVA) test at 95°C, round peas demonstrated well‐defined pasting profiles with higher final viscosity, while wrinkled peas exhibited minimal swelling and viscosity development. At 140°C, wrinkled peas displayed significant granular swelling and viscosity development, with variety PLS 595 showing the highest final viscosity among the wrinkled pea lines. Round peas had lower pasting temperatures, which is a minimum temperature to cook starch, by at least 40°C compared to wrinkled peas. The round peas formed stronger gels. Cluster analysis grouped round and wrinkled peas into two distinct clusters. The recorded parameters were also clustered into groups. Parameters in the same group were positively correlated while parameters from the different groups were negatively correlated. Wrinkled peas exhibited higher early‐stage digestibility, but comparable total digestible starch after 4 h of digestion compared to round peas. The resistant starch concentration was slightly lower in wrinkled peas compared to round peas. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed distinct granular morphologies: round peas had simple granules, while wrinkled peas had compound granules. Conclusions The study highlights significant differences between round and wrinkled peas in terms of their starch properties. Significance and Novelty The findings suggest potential for targeted use of these starches based on their unique properties. Utilization of starch‐rich byproducts has an important implication on the overall economic viability and sustainability of pea protein isolation processes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cereal Chemistry
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10880
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Food composition and properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physicochemical, Morphological, and Digestibility Properties of Round and Wrinkled Pea Starches

Sean Finnie, Rebecca J. McGee, Sintayehu D. Daba
4 citations
Cereal Chemistry
Food composition and properties
4.48
article

Physicochemical, Morphological, and Digestibility Properties of Round and Wrinkled Pea Starches

Sean Finnie, Rebecca J. McGee, Sintayehu D. Daba
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives Pea protein isolation results in a significant amount of starch‐rich byproduct. Efficient utilization of this byproduct can be crucial for economic feasibility of protein isolation process. In this study, we examined the physicochemical, morphological, and digestibility properties of starches derived from round and wrinkled peas grown across three locations (Pullman, WA; Richland, MT; and Sidney, MT) in 2023. Findings Our findings showed that wrinkled pea flour had higher protein, but lower starch concentration compared to round pea flour. The starch from wrinkled peas contained a higher amylose concentration than that from round peas (60% vs. 29%). When subjected to a Rapid Visco Analyzer (RVA) test at 95°C, round peas demonstrated well‐defined pasting profiles with higher final viscosity, while wrinkled peas exhibited minimal swelling and viscosity development. At 140°C, wrinkled peas displayed significant granular swelling and viscosity development, with variety PLS 595 showing the highest final viscosity among the wrinkled pea lines. Round peas had lower pasting temperatures, which is a minimum temperature to cook starch, by at least 40°C compared to wrinkled peas. The round peas formed stronger gels. Cluster analysis grouped round and wrinkled peas into two distinct clusters. The recorded parameters were also clustered into groups. Parameters in the same group were positively correlated while parameters from the different groups were negatively correlated. Wrinkled peas exhibited higher early‐stage digestibility, but comparable total digestible starch after 4 h of digestion compared to round peas. The resistant starch concentration was slightly lower in wrinkled peas compared to round peas. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed distinct granular morphologies: round peas had simple granules, while wrinkled peas had compound granules. Conclusions The study highlights significant differences between round and wrinkled peas in terms of their starch properties. Significance and Novelty The findings suggest potential for targeted use of these starches based on their unique properties. Utilization of starch‐rich byproducts has an important implication on the overall economic viability and sustainability of pea protein isolation processes.

Cereal ChemistryVol. 102(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Food composition and properties
4.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.