EFFECTS OF SUSTAINED NATURAL APOPHYSEAL GLIDES WITH AND WITHOUT PILATES ON PAIN AND RANGE OF MOTION IN PATIENTS WITH LUMBAR DISC BULGE

Background: Lumbar disc bulge is a common musculoskeletal condition that leads to pain, restricted movement, and functional limitations, impacting activities such as bending, lifting, and prolonged sitting. This condition can contribute to immobility and disability, significantly affecting the quality of life. Effective rehabilitation strategies are crucial to restoring spinal function, improving range of motion (ROM), and reducing pain. Manual therapy techniques such as Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGS) and movement-based exercises like Pilates have been explored as treatment options to enhance spinal mobility and relieve symptoms. Objective: To compare the effects of Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGS) with and without Pilates on pain and lumbar range of motion in patients with lumbar disc bulge. Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted at Bakhtawar Amin Hospital, Multan, over eight months following approval from the ethical council of Riphah College of Rehabilitation & Allied Health Sciences. A total of 44 participants were randomly assigned to Group A (SNAGS with Pilates) or Group B (SNAGS alone) using a lottery method. Group A received SNAGS, Pilates, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and therapeutic ultrasound, while Group B received SNAGS, TENS, and therapeutic ultrasound. Pain was assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and lumbar ROM was measured using an inclinometer. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26. Results: Statistically significant improvements were observed in both groups for pain and ROM (p = 0.000). In Group A, NPRS scores reduced from 7.95 ± 1.32 to 3.86 ± 1.20, while in Group B, they decreased from 7.54 ± 1.10 to 4.54 ± 1.33. Spinal flexion improved from 40.90 ± 4.93° to 51.68 ± 3.74° in Group A and from 38.31 ± 5.80° to 46.95 ± 4.67° in Group B. Spinal extension increased from 8.50 ± 1.71° to 13.77 ± 2.15° in Group A and from 8.50 ± 1.71° to 13.59 ± 2.08° in Group B. Pain relief was comparable in both groups, but Group A demonstrated superior improvements in spinal flexion. Conclusion: Both SNAGS and Pilates effectively reduced pain and improved ROM in patients with lumbar disc bulge. However, the addition of Pilates resulted in greater improvements in spinal mobility, suggesting that it is a beneficial adjunct to manual therapy for managing lumbar disc pathology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71000/hmwgs240
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EFFECTS OF SUSTAINED NATURAL APOPHYSEAL GLIDES WITH AND WITHOUT PILATES ON PAIN AND RANGE OF MOTION IN PATIENTS WITH LUMBAR DISC BULGE

M. H. Nasim, Faiza Ashraf, Anum Fatima, Ammar Javeid et al.
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

EFFECTS OF SUSTAINED NATURAL APOPHYSEAL GLIDES WITH AND WITHOUT PILATES ON PAIN AND RANGE OF MOTION IN PATIENTS WITH LUMBAR DISC BULGE

M. H. Nasim, Faiza Ashraf, Anum Fatima, Ammar Javeid, Muhammad Sarfraz, Rafia Imtiaz, Akmali Masood, Samia Khaliq
article en

Abstract

Background: Lumbar disc bulge is a common musculoskeletal condition that leads to pain, restricted movement, and functional limitations, impacting activities such as bending, lifting, and prolonged sitting. This condition can contribute to immobility and disability, significantly affecting the quality of life. Effective rehabilitation strategies are crucial to restoring spinal function, improving range of motion (ROM), and reducing pain. Manual therapy techniques such as Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGS) and movement-based exercises like Pilates have been explored as treatment options to enhance spinal mobility and relieve symptoms. Objective: To compare the effects of Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGS) with and without Pilates on pain and lumbar range of motion in patients with lumbar disc bulge. Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted at Bakhtawar Amin Hospital, Multan, over eight months following approval from the ethical council of Riphah College of Rehabilitation & Allied Health Sciences. A total of 44 participants were randomly assigned to Group A (SNAGS with Pilates) or Group B (SNAGS alone) using a lottery method. Group A received SNAGS, Pilates, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and therapeutic ultrasound, while Group B received SNAGS, TENS, and therapeutic ultrasound. Pain was assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and lumbar ROM was measured using an inclinometer. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26. Results: Statistically significant improvements were observed in both groups for pain and ROM (p = 0.000). In Group A, NPRS scores reduced from 7.95 ± 1.32 to 3.86 ± 1.20, while in Group B, they decreased from 7.54 ± 1.10 to 4.54 ± 1.33. Spinal flexion improved from 40.90 ± 4.93° to 51.68 ± 3.74° in Group A and from 38.31 ± 5.80° to 46.95 ± 4.67° in Group B. Spinal extension increased from 8.50 ± 1.71° to 13.77 ± 2.15° in Group A and from 8.50 ± 1.71° to 13.59 ± 2.08° in Group B. Pain relief was comparable in both groups, but Group A demonstrated superior improvements in spinal flexion. Conclusion: Both SNAGS and Pilates effectively reduced pain and improved ROM in patients with lumbar disc bulge. However, the addition of Pilates resulted in greater improvements in spinal mobility, suggesting that it is a beneficial adjunct to manual therapy for managing lumbar disc pathology.

Insights-Journal of Health and RehabilitationVol. 3(2 (Health & Rehab))
Nishtar Medical College and Hospital (PK), Government College University, Faisalabad (PK), Riphah International University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.