IMPACTS OF DIFFERENT LEARNING INTENSITIES ON KINESTHETIC EFL STUDENTS’ SPEAKING PERFORMANCE

The study investigated the impacts of high, moderate, and low learning intensities on kinesthetic learners’ speaking performance in the Bachelor of English Literature program at Bumigora University. Using a quantitative research design, 42 kinesthetic learners were identified through a VARK questionnaire and a validated learning intensity questionnaire, categorizing them into three intensity groups. Speaking performance was assessed based on fluency, pronunciation, vocabulary, coherence, and task fulfillment. Data collection included administering both questionnaires and conducting speaking tests. One-Way ANOVA analysis revealed significant differences in speaking performance, with the high-intensity group achieving the highest mean score (91.38), followed by moderate (82.00) and low-intensity groups (70.21). The results confirmed these differences (Sig. 0.000 < 0.05), and Post-hoc analysis indicated that the high-intensity group significantly outperformed the moderate and low groups, with mean differences of 9.385 and 21.174, respectively (Sig. 0.000 < 0.05). The moderate group also significantly surpassed the low group with a mean difference of 11.789 (Sig. 0.000 < 0.05). These findings suggest pedagogical implications for developing instructional strategies to enhance EFL speaking performance among kinesthetic learners. Higher learning intensity significantly improves speaking performance, and further research could explore its effects on other learning styles such as auditory or visual.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wiralodra English Journal
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31943/wej.v9i1.374
Primary Topic
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IMPACTS OF DIFFERENT LEARNING INTENSITIES ON KINESTHETIC EFL STUDENTS’ SPEAKING PERFORMANCE

Dedi Aprianto, Sutarman Sutarman
Wiralodra English Journal
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
article

IMPACTS OF DIFFERENT LEARNING INTENSITIES ON KINESTHETIC EFL STUDENTS’ SPEAKING PERFORMANCE

Dedi Aprianto, Sutarman Sutarman
article en

Abstract

The study investigated the impacts of high, moderate, and low learning intensities on kinesthetic learners’ speaking performance in the Bachelor of English Literature program at Bumigora University. Using a quantitative research design, 42 kinesthetic learners were identified through a VARK questionnaire and a validated learning intensity questionnaire, categorizing them into three intensity groups. Speaking performance was assessed based on fluency, pronunciation, vocabulary, coherence, and task fulfillment. Data collection included administering both questionnaires and conducting speaking tests. One-Way ANOVA analysis revealed significant differences in speaking performance, with the high-intensity group achieving the highest mean score (91.38), followed by moderate (82.00) and low-intensity groups (70.21). The results confirmed these differences (Sig. 0.000 < 0.05), and Post-hoc analysis indicated that the high-intensity group significantly outperformed the moderate and low groups, with mean differences of 9.385 and 21.174, respectively (Sig. 0.000 < 0.05). The moderate group also significantly surpassed the low group with a mean difference of 11.789 (Sig. 0.000 < 0.05). These findings suggest pedagogical implications for developing instructional strategies to enhance EFL speaking performance among kinesthetic learners. Higher learning intensity significantly improves speaking performance, and further research could explore its effects on other learning styles such as auditory or visual.

Wiralodra English JournalVol. 9(1)
Universitas Saburai (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.