Enhanced Best–Worst Method for Prioritizing Interdependent Risks

In the modern landscape, prioritizing risks is crucial for directing resources toward critical threats and ensuring organizational resilience and continuity. This study introduces an enhanced Best–Worst Method (BWM) that integrates risk interdependencies, employing clustering for efficient data handling and accurate prioritization. A case study in an online store confirmed the model’s validity, yielding significantly lower error rates and heightened consistency compared to the original BWM. Notable findings include identifying high-impact risks, such as failure to deliver on time and incorrect production capacity calculations. The enhanced BWM consistently outperformed Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in managing interdependencies, underscoring its robustness and reliability. Furthermore, the rank reversal test highlighted stable prioritizations across scenarios, validating the model’s resilience under varying conditions. This approach not only offers practical management insights for high-priority risks but also emphasizes strategic planning for enhanced organizational resilience, making it highly applicable in complex decision-making contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219622025500440
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhanced Best–Worst Method for Prioritizing Interdependent Risks

Bakhtiar Ostadi, Ramin Moradi
1 citations
International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making
Risk and Safety Analysis
1.40
article

Enhanced Best–Worst Method for Prioritizing Interdependent Risks

Bakhtiar Ostadi, Ramin Moradi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the modern landscape, prioritizing risks is crucial for directing resources toward critical threats and ensuring organizational resilience and continuity. This study introduces an enhanced Best–Worst Method (BWM) that integrates risk interdependencies, employing clustering for efficient data handling and accurate prioritization. A case study in an online store confirmed the model’s validity, yielding significantly lower error rates and heightened consistency compared to the original BWM. Notable findings include identifying high-impact risks, such as failure to deliver on time and incorrect production capacity calculations. The enhanced BWM consistently outperformed Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in managing interdependencies, underscoring its robustness and reliability. Furthermore, the rank reversal test highlighted stable prioritizations across scenarios, validating the model’s resilience under varying conditions. This approach not only offers practical management insights for high-priority risks but also emphasizes strategic planning for enhanced organizational resilience, making it highly applicable in complex decision-making contexts.

International Journal of Information Technology & Decision MakingVol. 25(01)
Tarbiat Modares University (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Risk and Safety Analysis
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Enhanced Best–Worst Method for Prioritizing Interdependent Risks — Bakhtiar Ostadi, Ramin Moradi · International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS