To scan or not to scan? Comparing the effectiveness and cost differential of insoles manufactured from foam-box casts versus direct scans in treating musculoskeletal conditions of the foot and ankle: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial
Authors
Graham J. Chapman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3983-6641)
A.J.A. Holland (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3745-8704)
Hannah Scott (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0707-8068)
Neil Munro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0150-326X)
Jim Richards (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4004-3115)
C. Dickson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4368-5308)
Laura Barr (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2010-4216)
To scan or not to scan? Comparing the effectiveness and cost differential of insoles manufactured from foam-box casts versus direct scans in treating musculoskeletal conditions of the foot and ankle: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial
Graham J. Chapman, A.J.A. Holland, Hannah Scott, Neil Munro et al.
Journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Topics
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article
To scan or not to scan? Comparing the effectiveness and cost differential of insoles manufactured from foam-box casts versus direct scans in treating musculoskeletal conditions of the foot and ankle: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial
Graham J. Chapman, A.J.A. Holland, Hannah Scott, Neil Munro, Jim Richards, C. Dickson, Laura Barr, Jillian Tawse
article en
Abstract
No abstract available for this paper.
Publication Tag
BMC Musculoskeletal DisordersVol. 26(1)
Institutions
University of Lancashire (GB), NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GB), Gartnavel General Hospital (GB)