A Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Systems in the United States and Sweden: Lessons and Implications for Pakistan

This paper presents a critical comparative analysis of the higher education systems of the United States and Sweden, with a focus on institutional structures, funding models, accessibility, and pedagogical approaches. Anchored in a qualitative research design and systematic literature review, the study examines how both countries address contemporary challenges and opportunities in higher education. The analysis highlights the strengths and limitations of each system, offering valuable lessons for reforming Pakistan’s higher education sector. While the United States emphasizes institutional autonomy, research, and innovation, it faces persistent issues related to affordability and equitable access. Conversely, Sweden's centralized and publicly funded model promotes inclusivity and social equity but raises concerns regarding long-term financial sustainability and institutional flexibility. Drawing on the comparative insights from these two models, the paper outlines practical recommendations for Pakistan to develop a more inclusive, innovative, and globally competitive higher education system that supports national development and socio-economic progress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œcritical review of social sciences studies
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59075/fzf8gq61
Primary Topic
Global Education Systems and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Systems in the United States and Sweden: Lessons and Implications for Pakistan

Samana Zafar, Tabassum Shairwani, Zul Ul Ane Fatima
˜The œcritical review of social sciences studies
Global Education Systems and Policies
article

A Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Systems in the United States and Sweden: Lessons and Implications for Pakistan

Samana Zafar, Tabassum Shairwani, Zul Ul Ane Fatima
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a critical comparative analysis of the higher education systems of the United States and Sweden, with a focus on institutional structures, funding models, accessibility, and pedagogical approaches. Anchored in a qualitative research design and systematic literature review, the study examines how both countries address contemporary challenges and opportunities in higher education. The analysis highlights the strengths and limitations of each system, offering valuable lessons for reforming Pakistan’s higher education sector. While the United States emphasizes institutional autonomy, research, and innovation, it faces persistent issues related to affordability and equitable access. Conversely, Sweden's centralized and publicly funded model promotes inclusivity and social equity but raises concerns regarding long-term financial sustainability and institutional flexibility. Drawing on the comparative insights from these two models, the paper outlines practical recommendations for Pakistan to develop a more inclusive, innovative, and globally competitive higher education system that supports national development and socio-economic progress.

˜The œcritical review of social sciences studiesVol. 3(1)
International Islamic University, Islamabad (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Global Education Systems and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Systems in the United States and Sweden: Lessons and Implications for Pakistan — Samana Zafar, Tabassum Shairwani, et al. · ˜The œcritical review of social sciences studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS