A Modular, Mechanical Knee Model for the Development and Validation of Robotic Testing Methodologies

Six-degree-of-freedom robotic testing is used to gain insight into knee function by measuring the biomechanics of cadaveric knees. However, it can be challenging to use cadaveric knees to validate robotic testing methodologies and to compare methodologies across laboratories because cadavers have variable properties and require lengthy preparation. Therefore, our primary objective was to develop a modular, mechanical knee model for robotic testing with comparable biomechanics to those of human cadaveric knees. A secondary objective was to use the knee model to benchmark the errors in ligament tensions measured using the superposition method, which is a common robotic testing workflow to determine in situ ligament tensions. We designed a knee model consisting of femur and tibia components that are constrained by their articular geometries and by ligament phantoms. We used our robotic testing system to measure the kinetic-kinematic relationships under anterior-posterior, varus-valgus, and internal-external rotation loading in four knee models with different design features. We achieved variable kinetic-kinematic relationships across the knee models by tensioning secondary restraints, altering the engagement of the ligament phantoms, and incorporating osteoarthritic features. The knee models had comparable laxities to cadaveric knees, although most knee models did not capture the flexion-dependent kinematics of cadaveric knees. We also found comparable errors in superposition-computed tensions in the lateral collateral ligament between the knee models and cadaveric knees. Therefore, the knee model is a biomechanically representative specimen that can be a valuable tool for developing and validating robotic testing methodologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4068262
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Modular, Mechanical Knee Model for the Development and Validation of Robotic Testing Methodologies

Joshua D. Roth, Lesley Arant, Jabneel Cardona-Perez
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

A Modular, Mechanical Knee Model for the Development and Validation of Robotic Testing Methodologies

Joshua D. Roth, Lesley Arant, Jabneel Cardona-Perez
article en

Abstract

Six-degree-of-freedom robotic testing is used to gain insight into knee function by measuring the biomechanics of cadaveric knees. However, it can be challenging to use cadaveric knees to validate robotic testing methodologies and to compare methodologies across laboratories because cadavers have variable properties and require lengthy preparation. Therefore, our primary objective was to develop a modular, mechanical knee model for robotic testing with comparable biomechanics to those of human cadaveric knees. A secondary objective was to use the knee model to benchmark the errors in ligament tensions measured using the superposition method, which is a common robotic testing workflow to determine in situ ligament tensions. We designed a knee model consisting of femur and tibia components that are constrained by their articular geometries and by ligament phantoms. We used our robotic testing system to measure the kinetic-kinematic relationships under anterior-posterior, varus-valgus, and internal-external rotation loading in four knee models with different design features. We achieved variable kinetic-kinematic relationships across the knee models by tensioning secondary restraints, altering the engagement of the ligament phantoms, and incorporating osteoarthritic features. The knee models had comparable laxities to cadaveric knees, although most knee models did not capture the flexion-dependent kinematics of cadaveric knees. We also found comparable errors in superposition-computed tensions in the lateral collateral ligament between the knee models and cadaveric knees. Therefore, the knee model is a biomechanically representative specimen that can be a valuable tool for developing and validating robotic testing methodologies.

Journal of Biomechanical EngineeringVol. 147(7)
University of Wisconsin System (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez (PR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Modular, Mechanical Knee Model for the Development and Validation of Robotic Testing Methodologies — Joshua D. Roth, Lesley Arant, et al. · Journal of Biomechanical Engineering (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS