Money fights for patents and meds: what can we learn from recent court decisions in Italy?

Abstract Over the course of 2024, the two highest courts in the Italian judicial system—ie the Supreme Court of Cassation and the Constitutional Court—rendered three landmark decisions that will significantly affect the national healthcare and life science sectors. Although these three decisions are on three separate cases each involving a different subject matter, they all involve original drug producers, manufacturers of generic or biosimilar products and the national health system—and one further actor in the background: the healthcare market itself. Starting from different angles and dealing with different sources of law, the three decisions alter the intrinsic and fundamental dynamics between the three-plus-one actors. These decisions require (i) a more cautious approach to designing the IP strategy of originators, (ii) adjustments to the negotiation practice within the supply chain to benefit from the Bolar exemption and (iii) a rethinking of the entire business models—including, their financial sustainability—to account for the peculiar manner in which the national healthcare system is sustained in Italy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpaf017
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property and Patents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Money fights for patents and meds: what can we learn from recent court decisions in Italy?

Andrea Andolina
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice
Intellectual Property and Patents
article

Money fights for patents and meds: what can we learn from recent court decisions in Italy?

Andrea Andolina
article en

Abstract

Abstract Over the course of 2024, the two highest courts in the Italian judicial system—ie the Supreme Court of Cassation and the Constitutional Court—rendered three landmark decisions that will significantly affect the national healthcare and life science sectors. Although these three decisions are on three separate cases each involving a different subject matter, they all involve original drug producers, manufacturers of generic or biosimilar products and the national health system—and one further actor in the background: the healthcare market itself. Starting from different angles and dealing with different sources of law, the three decisions alter the intrinsic and fundamental dynamics between the three-plus-one actors. These decisions require (i) a more cautious approach to designing the IP strategy of originators, (ii) adjustments to the negotiation practice within the supply chain to benefit from the Bolar exemption and (iii) a rethinking of the entire business models—including, their financial sustainability—to account for the peculiar manner in which the national healthcare system is sustained in Italy.

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & PracticeVol. 20(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Intellectual Property and Patents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.