A Comparative Study of English and Chinese Existential Sentences Based on Corpus

Existential sentence as a special syntax and semantic structure has been widely used by people. As the two languages with the largest number of speakers in the world, it is important and necessary to explore the internal structure of Chinese and English existential sentences. This study uses corpora to compare Chinese and English existential sentences and explore the reasons why the two kinds of existential sentences are so different. It’s found that they have similar syntactic structure. However, for the preverb component, English existential sentences usually have “there” in the preverb component. Chinese existential sentences have many forms of preverb components. For the noun phrases, the noun phrases are indefinite in both kinds of existential sentences. But the sentences type with a postpositive appositive clause is only seen in Chinese existential sentences. For the word order, in English existential sentences, position of the locative phrase (LP) is flexible, in Chinese existential sentences, however, the LP is fixed at beginning of the sentence. For the semantic, the semantic meaning and function of English and Chinese are similar, because they both represent the appearance, existence or disappearance and the locative adverbial in English existential sentences is equivalent to the existential regional words in Chinese. But there are more existential verbs in Chinese, with more complicated semantic types, and the distribution of the existential sentences they form is very extensive. The differences are explained from three aspects: ethic thinking pattens, ethic culture and languages themselves. These findings supplement the understanding of Chinese and English existential sentences and shed light on later studies should consider more corpora to study existential sentences.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Journal of Technology
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54691/n0kjgr24
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of English and Chinese Existential Sentences Based on Corpus

Tian Liu
Scientific Journal of Technology
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

A Comparative Study of English and Chinese Existential Sentences Based on Corpus

Tian Liu
article en

Abstract

Existential sentence as a special syntax and semantic structure has been widely used by people. As the two languages with the largest number of speakers in the world, it is important and necessary to explore the internal structure of Chinese and English existential sentences. This study uses corpora to compare Chinese and English existential sentences and explore the reasons why the two kinds of existential sentences are so different. It’s found that they have similar syntactic structure. However, for the preverb component, English existential sentences usually have “there” in the preverb component. Chinese existential sentences have many forms of preverb components. For the noun phrases, the noun phrases are indefinite in both kinds of existential sentences. But the sentences type with a postpositive appositive clause is only seen in Chinese existential sentences. For the word order, in English existential sentences, position of the locative phrase (LP) is flexible, in Chinese existential sentences, however, the LP is fixed at beginning of the sentence. For the semantic, the semantic meaning and function of English and Chinese are similar, because they both represent the appearance, existence or disappearance and the locative adverbial in English existential sentences is equivalent to the existential regional words in Chinese. But there are more existential verbs in Chinese, with more complicated semantic types, and the distribution of the existential sentences they form is very extensive. The differences are explained from three aspects: ethic thinking pattens, ethic culture and languages themselves. These findings supplement the understanding of Chinese and English existential sentences and shed light on later studies should consider more corpora to study existential sentences.

Scientific Journal of TechnologyVol. 7(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Study of English and Chinese Existential Sentences Based on Corpus — Tian Liu · Scientific Journal of Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS