Power and marginalization in discourse on AI in education (AIEd): social actors’ representation in China Daily (2018–2023)

Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd) has the potential to transform educational practice, and its media representation both reflects and reshapes public perceptions of this new technology. While interest in AIEd is growing worldwide, not all social actors are represented equally. Moreover, limited media coverage contributes to a scarcity of studies on AIEd media representations. This study examines how social actors are represented in AIEd discourses in China Daily (2018–2023), using 100 news articles selected through stratified proportional sampling in Nexis Uni to ensure balanced coverage across all years. Employing intertextuality analysis and social actor theory, the results show that government and corporate voices dominate, while public perspectives are marginalized. Discursive strategies, including objectivation, functionalization, and activation, construct a hierarchical collaboration, where government actors are activated to emphasize leadership, and corporate actors are functionalized as enabler to state-defined goals. Intertextuality analysis highlights co-occurrence between corporate and parental discourses, which risks prioritizing commercial interests over educational equity. This alignment weakened after 2021, reflecting a shift in government efforts to regulate educational commercialization. These findings show a hierarchical power dynamic in AIEd discourses, where government actors dominate and corporate actors subordinate, while public voices are marginalized. This framing prioritizes the institutional corporate and state interests, and limits inclusivity and diversity. This study advances the understanding of AIEd media discourses in a context distinct from Western-centric perspectives. By unpacking the imbalanced representations of social actors, this study uncovers the underlying power dynamics and ideologies in AIEd discourse. It encourages policymakers, educators, and media professionals to address equity and inclusion in media representations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04621-5
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Power and marginalization in discourse on AI in education (AIEd): social actors’ representation in China Daily (2018–2023)

Savitri Gadavanij, Xi Huang
3 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Online Learning and Analytics
5.08
article

Power and marginalization in discourse on AI in education (AIEd): social actors’ representation in China Daily (2018–2023)

Savitri Gadavanij, Xi Huang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd) has the potential to transform educational practice, and its media representation both reflects and reshapes public perceptions of this new technology. While interest in AIEd is growing worldwide, not all social actors are represented equally. Moreover, limited media coverage contributes to a scarcity of studies on AIEd media representations. This study examines how social actors are represented in AIEd discourses in China Daily (2018–2023), using 100 news articles selected through stratified proportional sampling in Nexis Uni to ensure balanced coverage across all years. Employing intertextuality analysis and social actor theory, the results show that government and corporate voices dominate, while public perspectives are marginalized. Discursive strategies, including objectivation, functionalization, and activation, construct a hierarchical collaboration, where government actors are activated to emphasize leadership, and corporate actors are functionalized as enabler to state-defined goals. Intertextuality analysis highlights co-occurrence between corporate and parental discourses, which risks prioritizing commercial interests over educational equity. This alignment weakened after 2021, reflecting a shift in government efforts to regulate educational commercialization. These findings show a hierarchical power dynamic in AIEd discourses, where government actors dominate and corporate actors subordinate, while public voices are marginalized. This framing prioritizes the institutional corporate and state interests, and limits inclusivity and diversity. This study advances the understanding of AIEd media discourses in a context distinct from Western-centric perspectives. By unpacking the imbalanced representations of social actors, this study uncovers the underlying power dynamics and ideologies in AIEd discourse. It encourages policymakers, educators, and media professionals to address equity and inclusion in media representations.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
National Institute of Development Administration (TH)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Online Learning and Analytics
5.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.