How does interest in a course interact with course learning?

The present study modeled how students' interest in a course of study changes and how those changes fit into their broader course experiences. The present study modelled the relationship between students' changing (latent growth curve) course interest, their readiness for learning (prior knowledge and interest), ongoing learning experiences (formative assessments) and important outcomes (post-course knowledge, self-efficacy, and interest). Postgraduate students ( n = 415) completed short surveys and formative assessments on six occasions across four weeks. Data were analysed within a latent structural equation model inclusive of a latent growth curve (course interest). Modelling pointed to the expected strong positive relationship between initial and growing course interest for latent outcomes (post interest and self-efficacy: β = .26-.44). At the same time, modelling revealed counterintuitive implications of prior knowledge for initial course interest ( β = -.12) and pre-class learning formative assessment for course interest slope ( β = −.21). Course interest (initial and growing) is important for course outcomes, but it might be exceptionally sensitive to prior knowledge and initial learning fit based on early learning experiences. • Initial/growing interest presented strong positive connections for latent outcomes. • Prior knowledge and Interest presented counter intuitive forward relationships. • Early formative assessment presented negatively predicted course interest slope.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning and Instruction
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102106
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
44.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How does interest in a course interact with course learning?

Alex Shum, Luke K. Fryer, Ronnel Bornasal King, Peter Lau
5 citations
Learning and Instruction
Student Assessment and Feedback
44.63
article

How does interest in a course interact with course learning?

Alex Shum, Luke K. Fryer, Ronnel Bornasal King, Peter Lau
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The present study modeled how students' interest in a course of study changes and how those changes fit into their broader course experiences. The present study modelled the relationship between students' changing (latent growth curve) course interest, their readiness for learning (prior knowledge and interest), ongoing learning experiences (formative assessments) and important outcomes (post-course knowledge, self-efficacy, and interest). Postgraduate students ( n = 415) completed short surveys and formative assessments on six occasions across four weeks. Data were analysed within a latent structural equation model inclusive of a latent growth curve (course interest). Modelling pointed to the expected strong positive relationship between initial and growing course interest for latent outcomes (post interest and self-efficacy: β = .26-.44). At the same time, modelling revealed counterintuitive implications of prior knowledge for initial course interest ( β = -.12) and pre-class learning formative assessment for course interest slope ( β = −.21). Course interest (initial and growing) is important for course outcomes, but it might be exceptionally sensitive to prior knowledge and initial learning fit based on early learning experiences. • Initial/growing interest presented strong positive connections for latent outcomes. • Prior knowledge and Interest presented counter intuitive forward relationships. • Early formative assessment presented negatively predicted course interest slope.

Learning and InstructionVol. 98
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Education University of Hong Kong (HK), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Student Assessment and Feedback
44.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How does interest in a course interact with course learning? — Alex Shum, Luke K. Fryer, et al. · Learning and Instruction (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS