Characterization of emissions from a turbojet engine running on sustainable aviation fuels, blends and conventional jet A1

Aviation contributes to air pollution and significantly impacts climate change. Sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs) offer a potential solution to reduce CO 2 emissions with the possible co-benefit of reducing emissions of particles. This study evaluates emissions of a turbojet engine using conventional Jet A1 fuel, Biojet fuel (alcohol-to-jet synthetic kerosene with aromatics, ATJ-SKA), hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO), and their blends. Emissions of particulate matter, gaseous pollutants (NOx, CO, total hydrocarbons, THC), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and aldehydes were measured across different engine loads (Taxi, Cruise and Take-Off). The results show that SAFs, particularly neat Biojet and HVO, significantly reduced particle emissions, by 20 – >99 % compared to Jet A1, especially in the Take-Off mode in case of the Biojet fuel. This reduction is likely connected to the differences in the chemical composition of the fuels including higher content of hydrogen and lower content of aromatics and naphthalenes. Emissions of VOCs, PAHs and aldehydes were reduced by 40–50 % in the Taxi mode, which has the highest emission factors and is also responsible for majority of emissions during the LTO cycle, while an increase was observed for the Take-Off mode. Biojet use exhibited improved engine performance at the Take-Off, but fuel blends showed mixed effects on efficiency. This study shows that SAFs present a promising route to reducing aviation's environmental footprint, with co-benefit of reduced impact on air pollution and non-CO 2 climate forcing from reduced particle emissions. Further research is required especially on impact of fuel blends on engine performance and emission characterization. • Emissions from two sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs), neat and blends with Jet A1 fuel, were compared to neat Jet A1 fuel. • The SAFs significantly reduced particle emissions compared to Jet A1 both in terms of particle mass and particle number. • The SAFs showed mixed results regarding emissions of VOCs and PAHs, aldehyde emissions increased with SAF use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric Environment X
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2025.100321
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterization of emissions from a turbojet engine running on sustainable aviation fuels, blends and conventional jet A1

Åsa M. Hallquist, Bo Strandberg, Jana Moldanová, Michael Priestley et al.
4 citations
Atmospheric Environment X
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
4.42
article

Characterization of emissions from a turbojet engine running on sustainable aviation fuels, blends and conventional jet A1

Åsa M. Hallquist, Bo Strandberg, Jana Moldanová, Michael Priestley, Kristoffer Danèl, Bengt Fallenius, Omar Abdalal, Annika Potter
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Aviation contributes to air pollution and significantly impacts climate change. Sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs) offer a potential solution to reduce CO 2 emissions with the possible co-benefit of reducing emissions of particles. This study evaluates emissions of a turbojet engine using conventional Jet A1 fuel, Biojet fuel (alcohol-to-jet synthetic kerosene with aromatics, ATJ-SKA), hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO), and their blends. Emissions of particulate matter, gaseous pollutants (NOx, CO, total hydrocarbons, THC), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and aldehydes were measured across different engine loads (Taxi, Cruise and Take-Off). The results show that SAFs, particularly neat Biojet and HVO, significantly reduced particle emissions, by 20 – >99 % compared to Jet A1, especially in the Take-Off mode in case of the Biojet fuel. This reduction is likely connected to the differences in the chemical composition of the fuels including higher content of hydrogen and lower content of aromatics and naphthalenes. Emissions of VOCs, PAHs and aldehydes were reduced by 40–50 % in the Taxi mode, which has the highest emission factors and is also responsible for majority of emissions during the LTO cycle, while an increase was observed for the Take-Off mode. Biojet use exhibited improved engine performance at the Take-Off, but fuel blends showed mixed effects on efficiency. This study shows that SAFs present a promising route to reducing aviation's environmental footprint, with co-benefit of reduced impact on air pollution and non-CO 2 climate forcing from reduced particle emissions. Further research is required especially on impact of fuel blends on engine performance and emission characterization. • Emissions from two sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs), neat and blends with Jet A1 fuel, were compared to neat Jet A1 fuel. • The SAFs significantly reduced particle emissions compared to Jet A1 both in terms of particle mass and particle number. • The SAFs showed mixed results regarding emissions of VOCs and PAHs, aldehyde emissions increased with SAF use.

Atmospheric Environment XVol. 26
Swedish Defence Research Agency (SE), Lund University (SE), IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute (SE), Lund Science (Sweden) (SE)
Trafikverket
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.