SWOT-AHP Analysis and Development Path of Interdisciplinary Integration of Physical Education

This paper focuses on the SWOT-AHP model. Through systematic analysis, this study sorts out the core difficulties faced by physical education, which is embodied in the subject barrier of curriculum design, the structural shortage of teacher resources and the utilitarian bias of social cognition. This paper makes an in-depth analysis from the four dimensions of advantages, disadvantages, opportunities and threats, and points out that interdisciplinary integration can improve students; comprehensive quality, promote the cooperation between teachers and students, and broaden their learning horizon, but it also faces challenges such as lack of teacher resources, lack of cases and lagging evaluation mechanism. Through the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) analysis method, the paper determines the weight of each factor, and puts forward the development paths such as optimizing the curriculum design, strengthening teacher training and improving the evaluation mechanism, so as to promote the deep integration of physical education and other disciplines and improve the quality of education.

Publication Details

Journal
Curriculum and Teaching Methodology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23977/curtm.2025.080211
Primary Topic
Educational Reforms and Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SWOT-AHP Analysis and Development Path of Interdisciplinary Integration of Physical Education

Curriculum and Teaching Methodology
Educational Reforms and Innovations
article

SWOT-AHP Analysis and Development Path of Interdisciplinary Integration of Physical Education

article en

Abstract

This paper focuses on the SWOT-AHP model. Through systematic analysis, this study sorts out the core difficulties faced by physical education, which is embodied in the subject barrier of curriculum design, the structural shortage of teacher resources and the utilitarian bias of social cognition. This paper makes an in-depth analysis from the four dimensions of advantages, disadvantages, opportunities and threats, and points out that interdisciplinary integration can improve students; comprehensive quality, promote the cooperation between teachers and students, and broaden their learning horizon, but it also faces challenges such as lack of teacher resources, lack of cases and lagging evaluation mechanism. Through the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) analysis method, the paper determines the weight of each factor, and puts forward the development paths such as optimizing the curriculum design, strengthening teacher training and improving the evaluation mechanism, so as to promote the deep integration of physical education and other disciplines and improve the quality of education.

Curriculum and Teaching MethodologyVol. 8(2)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Educational Reforms and Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

SWOT-AHP Analysis and Development Path of Interdisciplinary Integration of Physical Education · Curriculum and Teaching Methodology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS