How well do the reanalysis datasets capture hot and cold extremes and their trends in India?

Much of the Earth's surface lacks long-term in-situ measurement of essential meteorological variables. Climate reanalysis datasets provide an alternative in data-sparse regions, sometimes replacing gauge-based observations for climatological studies, however, they have inherent biases. Reanalysis is now available at finer spatial and temporal resolutions, that can be considered for hydrological and climatological studies. Although the assessment of reanalysis datasets is common at a daily, monthly, or seasonal scale, how the recent generation reanalysis captures the spatial pattern of extreme temperature events, and their trends remains an open question. In this study, two regional (IMDAA and EARS) and five global (ERA5-Land, ERA5, MERRA2, CFSR, and JRA3Q) reanalysis datasets are evaluated with a gauge-based gridded temperature dataset from the India Meteorological Department (IMD) to assess their suitability for studying extreme temperature events and their trends over India. Fifteen hot and cold extremes indices are identified to characterize extremes covering frequency, intensity, and duration of extreme temperature events. The study finds that no single reanalysis outperforms others for all the extreme indices when compared to the IMD gridded data, however, a select few (e.g., ERA5, ERA5L, MERRA2, and JRA3Q) better perform in reproducing the observed spatial pattern of extreme events and their changes across different regions of India. It is also noted that in response to global warming, the frequency, duration, and magnitude of extreme hot events are rising, and cold events are decreasing in India which is also captured by most of these reanalyses. Overall, the increase in hot extremes is more prominent in the south of the tropics and the decline in cold extremes is more evident in the north. However, the trend areas and magnitudes of the reanalysis datasets were not similar in comparison to trends from a regional station-based gridded dataset. Thus, care should be taken when selecting datasets for such applications and interpreting their trends. • The frequency, duration, and magnitude of extreme cold events are decreasing over India, while the hot extremes are rising. • Reanalysis has good potential for identifying frequency and duration-based extreme indices. • The reanalysis datasets capture the general warming trend over India, with some regional over and underestimation. • Compared to other reanalysis datasets, the estimated trends from ERA5 better matched with the IMD datasets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric Research
Published
2025-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.108073
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.74
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How well do the reanalysis datasets capture hot and cold extremes and their trends in India?

Marwan A. Hassan, S. Sreekesh, Vandana Choudhary, Suman Bhattacharyya
7 citations
Atmospheric Research
Climate variability and models
7.74
article

How well do the reanalysis datasets capture hot and cold extremes and their trends in India?

Marwan A. Hassan, S. Sreekesh, Vandana Choudhary, Suman Bhattacharyya
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Much of the Earth's surface lacks long-term in-situ measurement of essential meteorological variables. Climate reanalysis datasets provide an alternative in data-sparse regions, sometimes replacing gauge-based observations for climatological studies, however, they have inherent biases. Reanalysis is now available at finer spatial and temporal resolutions, that can be considered for hydrological and climatological studies. Although the assessment of reanalysis datasets is common at a daily, monthly, or seasonal scale, how the recent generation reanalysis captures the spatial pattern of extreme temperature events, and their trends remains an open question. In this study, two regional (IMDAA and EARS) and five global (ERA5-Land, ERA5, MERRA2, CFSR, and JRA3Q) reanalysis datasets are evaluated with a gauge-based gridded temperature dataset from the India Meteorological Department (IMD) to assess their suitability for studying extreme temperature events and their trends over India. Fifteen hot and cold extremes indices are identified to characterize extremes covering frequency, intensity, and duration of extreme temperature events. The study finds that no single reanalysis outperforms others for all the extreme indices when compared to the IMD gridded data, however, a select few (e.g., ERA5, ERA5L, MERRA2, and JRA3Q) better perform in reproducing the observed spatial pattern of extreme events and their changes across different regions of India. It is also noted that in response to global warming, the frequency, duration, and magnitude of extreme hot events are rising, and cold events are decreasing in India which is also captured by most of these reanalyses. Overall, the increase in hot extremes is more prominent in the south of the tropics and the decline in cold extremes is more evident in the north. However, the trend areas and magnitudes of the reanalysis datasets were not similar in comparison to trends from a regional station-based gridded dataset. Thus, care should be taken when selecting datasets for such applications and interpreting their trends. • The frequency, duration, and magnitude of extreme cold events are decreasing over India, while the hot extremes are rising. • Reanalysis has good potential for identifying frequency and duration-based extreme indices. • The reanalysis datasets capture the general warming trend over India, with some regional over and underestimation. • Compared to other reanalysis datasets, the estimated trends from ERA5 better matched with the IMD datasets.

Atmospheric ResearchVol. 321
University of British Columbia (CA), Jawaharlal Nehru University (IN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Climate variability and models
7.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.