Repeatability and reproducibility of brain age estimates in multiple sclerosis for three publicly available models

Accelerated brain aging is a marker of disease-related neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis (MS). Artificial intelligence models, trained on healthy individuals, can estimate age from brain MRI scans, but the effects of technical variations between MR scanners and conditions on these estimates are currently insufficiently investigated. This study aims to determine the within-scanner repeatability and between-scanner reproducibility of the brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD) across three brain age models. 30 people with multiple sclerosis and 10 healthy controls (mean age 44.2 ± 11.7 years and 39.2 ± 12.9 years, respectively), underwent six scans in a single day; a scan and immediate on a 3 T GE, 1.5 T Siemens and a 3 T Siemens MRI-scanner. Brain-PAD was determined using brainageR, DeepBrainNet and the MIDI-model from 3D T1w brain MRI-scans. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to quantify absolute agreement within-scanner (ICC-AA) and between-scanner consistency (ICC-C). Variance component analyses were used to determine the standard error of measurement (SEM) and the smallest detectable change (SDC). Brain-PAD was higher for pwMS compared to HC when predicted with brainageR and DeepBrainNet, not when predicted with the MIDI-model. Within-scanner repeatability was excellent (ICC-AA>0.93) for all models. Between-scanner reproducibility was good to excellent (ICC-C>0.85) for brainageR and the MIDI-model, while DeepBrainNet, showed excellent between-scanner reproducibility for Sola vs. VIDA (ICC-C:0.97), but moderate for GE vs. Sola and for GE vs. Vida (ICC-C:0.63 and 0.61). Between-scanner SDC was 6.56 years for brainageR, 5.57 years for the MIDI-model and 22.65 years for DeepBrainNet. Our findings demonstrated high repeatability of brain age estimates from the same scanner, but variable reproducibility across different scanners, irrespective of the brain age prediction model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuroimage Reports
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynirp.2025.100252
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Repeatability and reproducibility of brain age estimates in multiple sclerosis for three publicly available models

James H. Cole, Bas Jasperse, Bernard M.J. Uitdehaag, Eva M. M. Strijbis et al.
3 citations
Neuroimage Reports
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
4.41
article

Repeatability and reproducibility of brain age estimates in multiple sclerosis for three publicly available models

James H. Cole, Bas Jasperse, Bernard M.J. Uitdehaag, Eva M. M. Strijbis, Joost P.A. Kuijer, Bastiaan Moraal, Len Bos, Frederik Barkhof, Hugo Vrenken, Alle Meije Wink, David Rudolf van Nederpelt
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Accelerated brain aging is a marker of disease-related neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis (MS). Artificial intelligence models, trained on healthy individuals, can estimate age from brain MRI scans, but the effects of technical variations between MR scanners and conditions on these estimates are currently insufficiently investigated. This study aims to determine the within-scanner repeatability and between-scanner reproducibility of the brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD) across three brain age models. 30 people with multiple sclerosis and 10 healthy controls (mean age 44.2 ± 11.7 years and 39.2 ± 12.9 years, respectively), underwent six scans in a single day; a scan and immediate on a 3 T GE, 1.5 T Siemens and a 3 T Siemens MRI-scanner. Brain-PAD was determined using brainageR, DeepBrainNet and the MIDI-model from 3D T1w brain MRI-scans. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to quantify absolute agreement within-scanner (ICC-AA) and between-scanner consistency (ICC-C). Variance component analyses were used to determine the standard error of measurement (SEM) and the smallest detectable change (SDC). Brain-PAD was higher for pwMS compared to HC when predicted with brainageR and DeepBrainNet, not when predicted with the MIDI-model. Within-scanner repeatability was excellent (ICC-AA>0.93) for all models. Between-scanner reproducibility was good to excellent (ICC-C>0.85) for brainageR and the MIDI-model, while DeepBrainNet, showed excellent between-scanner reproducibility for Sola vs. VIDA (ICC-C:0.97), but moderate for GE vs. Sola and for GE vs. Vida (ICC-C:0.63 and 0.61). Between-scanner SDC was 6.56 years for brainageR, 5.57 years for the MIDI-model and 22.65 years for DeepBrainNet. Our findings demonstrated high repeatability of brain age estimates from the same scanner, but variable reproducibility across different scanners, irrespective of the brain age prediction model.

Neuroimage ReportsVol. 5(2)
Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Informa Healthcare (GB), University College London (GB)
ZonMw, Stichting MS Research
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
4.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.