Assessing solar-to-PV power conversion models: Physical, ML, and hybrid approaches across diverse scales

Solar energy, a sustainable and environmentally friendly power resource, has been widely adopted across industrial, urban, and agricultural sectors. With global photovoltaic (PV) installations reaching nearly 446 GW (GW) in 2023, accurate assessment and estimation of PV power output has become critical for enhancing system performance, grid integration and energy management In this study, we evaluate the effectiveness of physical, machine learning (ML), and hybrid models for solar-to-PV power conversion across varying spatial and temporal scales and diverse operational scenarios. For relatively simple cases requiring immediate power output predictions without reliance on historical data, we applied and assessed physical and ML models. In more complex, large-scale PV station scenarios, we analyzed the limitations of physical and end-to-end ML models, identifying significant estimation errors caused by the nonlinear behavior of solar irradiance. To address these challenges, we developed an advanced hybrid model that combines a temporal-aware multi-level mixer (TMM) algorithm with the physical IV model, achieving significantly improved estimation accuracy. By benchmarking the model performance using metrics such as root mean square error (RMSE) and mean bias error (MBE), this work provides a comprehensive analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of different models under varied conditions. The findings offer valuable guidance for model selection and optimization, supporting the development of more reliable and efficient solar energy systems. • Comparative Analysis: Evaluates physical, ML, and hybrid models for PV power output estimation. • Physical Model : Best for medium-term estimates in mid-sized PV stations with limited data. • ML Model : SVR excels in simple cases with historical data, outperforming physical models. • Complex Scenarios: Both models struggle with large-scale PV due to non-linear irradiance effects. • Hybrid Model: TMM-based hybrid model cuts RMSE by ∼9% vs. ML models, improving grid integration and sustainable energy use.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Energy
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.135744
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing solar-to-PV power conversion models: Physical, ML, and hybrid approaches across diverse scales

Bohan Zhang, Matthew H. Y. Xie, Sujun Zhang, Caixia Li et al.
7 citations
Energy
Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
17.37
article

Assessing solar-to-PV power conversion models: Physical, ML, and hybrid approaches across diverse scales

Bohan Zhang, Matthew H. Y. Xie, Sujun Zhang, Caixia Li, Ziheng Liu, Wenjie Zhang, Yuanyuan Xu, Pengfei Zhang, Xiaojing Hao, Bo Xiao
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Solar energy, a sustainable and environmentally friendly power resource, has been widely adopted across industrial, urban, and agricultural sectors. With global photovoltaic (PV) installations reaching nearly 446 GW (GW) in 2023, accurate assessment and estimation of PV power output has become critical for enhancing system performance, grid integration and energy management In this study, we evaluate the effectiveness of physical, machine learning (ML), and hybrid models for solar-to-PV power conversion across varying spatial and temporal scales and diverse operational scenarios. For relatively simple cases requiring immediate power output predictions without reliance on historical data, we applied and assessed physical and ML models. In more complex, large-scale PV station scenarios, we analyzed the limitations of physical and end-to-end ML models, identifying significant estimation errors caused by the nonlinear behavior of solar irradiance. To address these challenges, we developed an advanced hybrid model that combines a temporal-aware multi-level mixer (TMM) algorithm with the physical IV model, achieving significantly improved estimation accuracy. By benchmarking the model performance using metrics such as root mean square error (RMSE) and mean bias error (MBE), this work provides a comprehensive analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of different models under varied conditions. The findings offer valuable guidance for model selection and optimization, supporting the development of more reliable and efficient solar energy systems. • Comparative Analysis: Evaluates physical, ML, and hybrid models for PV power output estimation. • Physical Model : Best for medium-term estimates in mid-sized PV stations with limited data. • ML Model : SVR excels in simple cases with historical data, outperforming physical models. • Complex Scenarios: Both models struggle with large-scale PV due to non-linear irradiance effects. • Hybrid Model: TMM-based hybrid model cuts RMSE by ∼9% vs. ML models, improving grid integration and sustainable energy use.

EnergyVol. 323
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
17.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.