Clinical Assessment of Pain Levels and Debonding Forces Using the Damon Clear Debonding Plier: A Split-Mouth, Controlled Clinical Trial

Introduction: We aimed to assess pain levels and debonding forces using the Damon Clear debonding plier. Methods: Forty orthodontic patients aged 17 to 25 years were assigned to two groups for a split-mouth comparison: group A (control) ( n = 40) utilized the bracket remover plier, while group B ( n = 40) used the Damon Clear debonding plier with a third wedging arm. Prior to debonding, patients’ anxiety levels were evaluated using questionnaires. Pain perception was assessed using a Numerical Rating Scale, and the force required for debonding was measured using a force-sensitive prototype. Results: The mean debonding force did not differ significantly between the two groups ( P = 0.53). However, group A exhibited significantly lower debonding pain scores compared to group B ( P < 0.001). Conclusion: This study suggests that the traditional bracket remover plier may lead to reduced debonding pain levels compared to the novel debonding plier with a third wedging arm. Further research is necessary to explore the factors contributing to pain during debonding and to develop strategies for minimizing patient discomfort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dental Hypotheses
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/denthyp.denthyp_76_23
Primary Topic
Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Assessment of Pain Levels and Debonding Forces Using the Damon Clear Debonding Plier: A Split-Mouth, Controlled Clinical Trial

Layth M. K. Nissan, Hasanain L. Smaysim
Dental Hypotheses
Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
article

Clinical Assessment of Pain Levels and Debonding Forces Using the Damon Clear Debonding Plier: A Split-Mouth, Controlled Clinical Trial

Layth M. K. Nissan, Hasanain L. Smaysim
article en

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to assess pain levels and debonding forces using the Damon Clear debonding plier. Methods: Forty orthodontic patients aged 17 to 25 years were assigned to two groups for a split-mouth comparison: group A (control) ( n = 40) utilized the bracket remover plier, while group B ( n = 40) used the Damon Clear debonding plier with a third wedging arm. Prior to debonding, patients’ anxiety levels were evaluated using questionnaires. Pain perception was assessed using a Numerical Rating Scale, and the force required for debonding was measured using a force-sensitive prototype. Results: The mean debonding force did not differ significantly between the two groups ( P = 0.53). However, group A exhibited significantly lower debonding pain scores compared to group B ( P < 0.001). Conclusion: This study suggests that the traditional bracket remover plier may lead to reduced debonding pain levels compared to the novel debonding plier with a third wedging arm. Further research is necessary to explore the factors contributing to pain during debonding and to develop strategies for minimizing patient discomfort.

Dental HypothesesVol. 16(1)
University of Baghdad (IQ), Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Clinical Assessment of Pain Levels and Debonding Forces Using the Damon Clear Debonding Plier: A Split-Mouth, Controlled Clinical Trial — Layth M. K. Nissan, Hasanain L. Smaysim · Dental Hypotheses (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS