The effect of using Daniel's model on mathematical thinking among middle school students

The current research aims to know the effect of using the Daniel model on mathematical thinking among middle school students. To achieve this goal, the researcher set the following null hypothesis: There is no statistically significant difference at a significance level of 0.05 between the average scores of the students of the experimental group who studied according to the Daniel model and the average scores of the students of the control group who studied according to the usual method in the mathematical thinking test. The research community included second-grade middle school students from the General Directorate of Education, Baghdad, Karkh III, for the academic year 2023. As for the research sample, it consisted of several students distributed between two groups, as follows: Is it warm in the experimental group and is thrown in the control group? The researcher chose the experimental design with partial control for one experimental variable, which is the Daniel model, and one dependent variable, which is mathematical thinking. The researcher matched the two groups with some variables. The research required a tool to measure the dependent variable, which is mathematical thinking. Therefore, the researcher prepared the mathematical thinking test, as the number of its paragraphs reached 17 paragraphs, 14 of which are objective and three are essay paragraphs. To verify the research hypothesis, she used the researcher used some special statistical methods, including the difficulty coefficient, the discrimination coefficient, the coefficient of effectiveness of alternatives, the Kuder-Richardson equation 20, the Cronbach alpha, and the t-test. Among the most important results reached by the research is the presence of a statistically significant difference at a significance level of 0.5% between the average scores of the experimental group students who studied according to the Daniel model and the average scores of the control group who studied according to the traditional method in the mathematical thinking test, in favor of the experimental group. In light of the research results, the researcher presented some recommendations, including using this model in teaching the rest of the mathematics subjects and teaching it at different levels and using modern models such as the Daniel model and paying attention to mathematical thinking because it is one of the goals of teaching mathematics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Educational Sciences and Arts
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59992/ijesa.2025.v4n3p6
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of using Daniel's model on mathematical thinking among middle school students

Saba Falih
International Journal of Educational Sciences and Arts
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
article

The effect of using Daniel's model on mathematical thinking among middle school students

Saba Falih
article en

Abstract

The current research aims to know the effect of using the Daniel model on mathematical thinking among middle school students. To achieve this goal, the researcher set the following null hypothesis: There is no statistically significant difference at a significance level of 0.05 between the average scores of the students of the experimental group who studied according to the Daniel model and the average scores of the students of the control group who studied according to the usual method in the mathematical thinking test. The research community included second-grade middle school students from the General Directorate of Education, Baghdad, Karkh III, for the academic year 2023. As for the research sample, it consisted of several students distributed between two groups, as follows: Is it warm in the experimental group and is thrown in the control group? The researcher chose the experimental design with partial control for one experimental variable, which is the Daniel model, and one dependent variable, which is mathematical thinking. The researcher matched the two groups with some variables. The research required a tool to measure the dependent variable, which is mathematical thinking. Therefore, the researcher prepared the mathematical thinking test, as the number of its paragraphs reached 17 paragraphs, 14 of which are objective and three are essay paragraphs. To verify the research hypothesis, she used the researcher used some special statistical methods, including the difficulty coefficient, the discrimination coefficient, the coefficient of effectiveness of alternatives, the Kuder-Richardson equation 20, the Cronbach alpha, and the t-test. Among the most important results reached by the research is the presence of a statistically significant difference at a significance level of 0.5% between the average scores of the experimental group students who studied according to the Daniel model and the average scores of the control group who studied according to the traditional method in the mathematical thinking test, in favor of the experimental group. In light of the research results, the researcher presented some recommendations, including using this model in teaching the rest of the mathematics subjects and teaching it at different levels and using modern models such as the Daniel model and paying attention to mathematical thinking because it is one of the goals of teaching mathematics.

International Journal of Educational Sciences and ArtsVol. 4(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.