The LSPE-Strip pointing reconstruction and Star Tracker

Abstract This work is part of a series of papers describing in detail the design and characterization of the LSPE-Strip , a microwave telescope operating in the Q- and W-bands which is foreseen to be installed at the Observatorio del Teide in Tenerife. The paper aims to describe the Pointing Reconstruction Model (PRM) and the prototype Star Tracker, which will be mounted on LSPE-Strip . Pointing reconstruction is a crucial step in deriving sky maps of foreground emissions. The PRM will be in charge of integrating the information on the instantaneous attitude provided by the telescope control system, encoded in two control angles, to obtain the actual pointing direction and focal plane orientation of the telescope. The PRM encodes various non-idealities in the telescope setup from eight configuration angles. The Star Tracker, plus the observation of an artificial source installed on a drone and possibly observations of point sources of known positions, will be used to calibrate the configuration angles of the PRM. We study the pointing error produced by incorrectly calibrating configuration angles by comparing surveys with different realizations of systematic pointing errors against the ideal case. In this way, we validated the required ≈ 1 arcmin maximum systematic pointing error in the LSPE-Strip survey as the worst effect of the pointing error, in this case, is two orders of magnitude below the instrumental sensitivity. After a description of the main structure and operations of the Start Tracker, we present the results of a campaign of actual sky observations carried out on a prototype of the Star Tracker aimed at assessing the final Star Tracker accuracy. From the point of view of performance, the Star Tracker prototype fully represents the final Star Tracker, the main differences being related to several implementation details. The results show a Star Tracker RMS accuracy is ≈ 3 arcsec while the systematic error is below 10 arcsec. From those results, we analyzed the problem of reconstructing the PRM configuration angles by simulating a calibration survey. Given the need to intercalibrate the offset of the Start Tracker pointing direction with respect to the focal plane pointing direction, we simulated two possible intercalibration strategies: one by simulating intercalibration with the use of observations of planets, the second by observing a drone carrying an optical beacon and a radio beacon. In the first case, the accuracy is determined by the level of 1/ f instrumental plus atmospheric noise, determining the S / N by which the planet can be observed. A very conservative S/N=10 case and a more likely S/N=50 case have been considered, allowing for an intercalibration accuracy respectively of 1 arcmin and 1/3 arcmin. In the second case, the most important source of error is the correct evaluation of the parallaxes between the telescope and the Star Tracker. Our analysis shows that the intercalibration accuracy will be between 0.25 arcmin and 1 arcmin in the worst cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Instrumentation
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/20/03/p03029
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The LSPE-Strip pointing reconstruction and Star Tracker

M. Maris, M. Gervasi, M. Bersanelli, Matteo Baratto et al.
1 citations
Journal of Instrumentation
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
1.15
article

The LSPE-Strip pointing reconstruction and Star Tracker

M. Maris, M. Gervasi, M. Bersanelli, Matteo Baratto, D. Tavagnacco, A. Mennella, M. Tomasi, F. Cuttaia, A. Zacchei, M. Zannoni, O. A. Peverini, R. Génova-Santos, F. Villa, F. Nati, C. Franceschet, S. Mandelli, Stefano Sartori, Fabio Paonessa, Francesco Cavaliere, J. A. Rubiño-Martín, Barbara Caccianiga
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This work is part of a series of papers describing in detail the design and characterization of the LSPE-Strip , a microwave telescope operating in the Q- and W-bands which is foreseen to be installed at the Observatorio del Teide in Tenerife. The paper aims to describe the Pointing Reconstruction Model (PRM) and the prototype Star Tracker, which will be mounted on LSPE-Strip . Pointing reconstruction is a crucial step in deriving sky maps of foreground emissions. The PRM will be in charge of integrating the information on the instantaneous attitude provided by the telescope control system, encoded in two control angles, to obtain the actual pointing direction and focal plane orientation of the telescope. The PRM encodes various non-idealities in the telescope setup from eight configuration angles. The Star Tracker, plus the observation of an artificial source installed on a drone and possibly observations of point sources of known positions, will be used to calibrate the configuration angles of the PRM. We study the pointing error produced by incorrectly calibrating configuration angles by comparing surveys with different realizations of systematic pointing errors against the ideal case. In this way, we validated the required ≈ 1 arcmin maximum systematic pointing error in the LSPE-Strip survey as the worst effect of the pointing error, in this case, is two orders of magnitude below the instrumental sensitivity. After a description of the main structure and operations of the Start Tracker, we present the results of a campaign of actual sky observations carried out on a prototype of the Star Tracker aimed at assessing the final Star Tracker accuracy. From the point of view of performance, the Star Tracker prototype fully represents the final Star Tracker, the main differences being related to several implementation details. The results show a Star Tracker RMS accuracy is ≈ 3 arcsec while the systematic error is below 10 arcsec. From those results, we analyzed the problem of reconstructing the PRM configuration angles by simulating a calibration survey. Given the need to intercalibrate the offset of the Start Tracker pointing direction with respect to the focal plane pointing direction, we simulated two possible intercalibration strategies: one by simulating intercalibration with the use of observations of planets, the second by observing a drone carrying an optical beacon and a radio beacon. In the first case, the accuracy is determined by the level of 1/ f instrumental plus atmospheric noise, determining the S / N by which the planet can be observed. A very conservative S/N=10 case and a more likely S/N=50 case have been considered, allowing for an intercalibration accuracy respectively of 1 arcmin and 1/3 arcmin. In the second case, the most important source of error is the correct evaluation of the parallaxes between the telescope and the Star Tracker. Our analysis shows that the intercalibration accuracy will be between 0.25 arcmin and 1 arcmin in the worst cases.

Journal of InstrumentationVol. 20(03)
Universidad de La Laguna (ES), University of Milan (IT), Trieste Astronomical Observatory (IT), Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica Cosmica di Bologna (IT), Institute of Electronics, Computer and Telecommunication Engineering (IT), Cineca (IT), Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (ES), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Milano (IT), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Milano Bicocca (IT), Osservatorio Astronomico della Regione Autonoma Valle d'Aosta (IT), Institute for Fundamental Physics of the Universe (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT), European Organization for Nuclear Research (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.