Human cooperation with artificial agents varies across countries

People are keen to exploit cooperative artificial agents for selfish gain. While this phenomenon has been observed in numerous Western societies, we show here that it is absent in Japan. We examined people's willingness to cooperate with artificial agents and humans in two classic economic games requiring a choice between self interest and mutual benefit. Our participants in the United States cooperated with artificial agents significantly less than they did with humans, whereas participants in Japan exhibited equivalent levels of cooperation with both types of co-player. We found a notable difference in how people felt about exploiting their cooperative partner: people in Japan emotionally treated artificial agents and humans alike, whereas people in the United States felt bad about exploiting humans, but not machines. Our findings underscore the necessity for nuanced cultural considerations in the design and implementation of such technology across diverse societies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92977-8
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human cooperation with artificial agents varies across countries

Abolfazl Bahrami, Rickmer Schulte, Ophelia D. Deroy, Maximilian Weigert et al.
3 citations
Scientific Reports
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
12.60
article

Human cooperation with artificial agents varies across countries

Abolfazl Bahrami, Rickmer Schulte, Ophelia D. Deroy, Maximilian Weigert, Jurgis Karpus, Júlia Tovar Verba, Risako Shirai, Katsumi Watanabe
article en
3 citations

Abstract

People are keen to exploit cooperative artificial agents for selfish gain. While this phenomenon has been observed in numerous Western societies, we show here that it is absent in Japan. We examined people's willingness to cooperate with artificial agents and humans in two classic economic games requiring a choice between self interest and mutual benefit. Our participants in the United States cooperated with artificial agents significantly less than they did with humans, whereas participants in Japan exhibited equivalent levels of cooperation with both types of co-player. We found a notable difference in how people felt about exploiting their cooperative partner: people in Japan emotionally treated artificial agents and humans alike, whereas people in the United States felt bad about exploiting humans, but not machines. Our findings underscore the necessity for nuanced cultural considerations in the design and implementation of such technology across diverse societies.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of London (GB), Statistisches Bundesamt (DE), Waseda University (JP), Royal Holloway University of London (GB), Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP), School of Advanced Study (GB), Munich School of Philosophy (DE), LMU Klinikum (DE), Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.