Managing marine resources sustainably – But how do we know when marine management has been successful?

Current marine environmental management is the ‘sustainable management of people and their marine activities’ to be achieved through ecosystem manipulation and activity control. Marine management per se needs to define who requires and can achieve a successfully managed environment, the tools and indicators for that management, the indications of success and the means of knowing that the environment has been successfully managed. Indicators of success require policies and plans, environmental targets and regulatory standards and guidelines, i.e. output controls such as those stipulated by legislation. It should aim for sustainable outcomes based on government policy, to satisfy public demands and using the advice and assessments by natural and social scientists. The inputs, outputs and outcomes should include scientific research and advice, reporting to the government and the public as well as compliance in programme performance evaluations. In this, there are three interested bodies: (i) those requiring a successfully managed environment such as the public; (ii) those responsible to carry-out and monitor the programmes and regulate humans and their activities as mandated by government such as administrators and regulators, and (iii) those implementing the management measures. Here, examples from Europe and North America but with relevance to all maritime states are used to emphasise that management success encompasses a well-defined planning cycle with a vision achieved as the result of objectives being met leading to actions carried out leading to outputs produced leading to outcomes achieved. • Marine environmental management derives from many, often conflicting, approaches. • Successful management requires a vision, outputs and outcomes to be well-defined. • Clear measures of success in marine management should be embedded in a planning cycle. • There needs to be a clear definition of who is responsible for marine management. • Canadian and European case-studies are used to illustrate these points.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ocean & Coastal Management
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107623
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
29.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing marine resources sustainably – But how do we know when marine management has been successful?

Roland Cormier, Michael Elliott, Ángel Borja
12 citations
Ocean & Coastal Management
Coastal and Marine Management
29.06
article

Managing marine resources sustainably – But how do we know when marine management has been successful?

Roland Cormier, Michael Elliott, Ángel Borja
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Current marine environmental management is the ‘sustainable management of people and their marine activities’ to be achieved through ecosystem manipulation and activity control. Marine management per se needs to define who requires and can achieve a successfully managed environment, the tools and indicators for that management, the indications of success and the means of knowing that the environment has been successfully managed. Indicators of success require policies and plans, environmental targets and regulatory standards and guidelines, i.e. output controls such as those stipulated by legislation. It should aim for sustainable outcomes based on government policy, to satisfy public demands and using the advice and assessments by natural and social scientists. The inputs, outputs and outcomes should include scientific research and advice, reporting to the government and the public as well as compliance in programme performance evaluations. In this, there are three interested bodies: (i) those requiring a successfully managed environment such as the public; (ii) those responsible to carry-out and monitor the programmes and regulate humans and their activities as mandated by government such as administrators and regulators, and (iii) those implementing the management measures. Here, examples from Europe and North America but with relevance to all maritime states are used to emphasise that management success encompasses a well-defined planning cycle with a vision achieved as the result of objectives being met leading to actions carried out leading to outputs produced leading to outcomes achieved. • Marine environmental management derives from many, often conflicting, approaches. • Successful management requires a vision, outputs and outcomes to be well-defined. • Clear measures of success in marine management should be embedded in a planning cycle. • There needs to be a clear definition of who is responsible for marine management. • Canadian and European case-studies are used to illustrate these points.

Ocean & Coastal ManagementVol. 265
Fisheries and Oceans Canada (CA), University of Hull (GB), Marine Technology Unit (ES)
UK Research and Innovation, HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Coastal and Marine Management
29.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.