Thank You to Our 2024 Reviewers

Abstract The Editors of the Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface would like to express our thanks and appreciation to everyone who served as reviewers for this journal during 2024. We extend our thanks to the 806 reviewers who provided 1,069 reviews of manuscripts for JGR: Earth Surface. Finding the time to provide good quality and detailed peer reviews can be challenging, and requires individuals to take time from their own research to contribute to the progress of our field more widely. Providing peer review can also be a mentoring practice for early career colleagues, both through providing constructive feedback on their work and through co‐reviewing as a means of training the next generation of reviewers. We greatly appreciate the large community of geomorphologists who have taken the time to write reviews, and particularly for providing constructive and critical feedback that guides authors to write the best possible paper about their research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jf008441
Primary Topic
Academic Publishing and Open Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thank You to Our 2024 Reviewers

Ann V. Rowan, Jaap H. Nienhuis, Joel B. Sankey, Amy E. East et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface
Academic Publishing and Open Access
article

Thank You to Our 2024 Reviewers

Ann V. Rowan, Jaap H. Nienhuis, Joel B. Sankey, Amy E. East, Antonius J. F. Hoitink, O. V. Sergienko, Mikaël Attal
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Editors of the Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface would like to express our thanks and appreciation to everyone who served as reviewers for this journal during 2024. We extend our thanks to the 806 reviewers who provided 1,069 reviews of manuscripts for JGR: Earth Surface. Finding the time to provide good quality and detailed peer reviews can be challenging, and requires individuals to take time from their own research to contribute to the progress of our field more widely. Providing peer review can also be a mentoring practice for early career colleagues, both through providing constructive feedback on their work and through co‐reviewing as a means of training the next generation of reviewers. We greatly appreciate the large community of geomorphologists who have taken the time to write reviews, and particularly for providing constructive and critical feedback that guides authors to write the best possible paper about their research.

Journal of Geophysical Research Earth SurfaceVol. 130(3)
United States Geological Survey (US), Utrecht University (NL), Princeton University (US), Pacific Science Center (US), Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center, University of Bergen (NO), Wageningen University & Research (NL), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Johns Hopkins University
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Academic Publishing and Open Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.