Multiparametric standards for performance assessment and quality control of fluorescence molecular imaging and endoscopy systems

Fluorescence molecular imaging (FMI) and endoscopy (FME) are technologies with great potential for image-guided surgical or diagnostic interventions. However, FMI and FME still present challenges that can confound real-time decision making for disease management and/or treatment. Importantly, the markedly different systems hurdle the repeatability of measurements, the unbiased readout interpretation, and the wide clinical acceptability of FMI and FME. Herein we present different multi-parametric standards to perform quality control and performance assessment of FMI and FME systems. Moreover, we discuss examples illustrating how data analysis and the design of fluorescence standards influence performance assessment outcomes, potentially affecting comparisons between systems or studies. We, also, show the first standard tailored to the requirements of FME and demonstrate its use for quality control of a fiberscope-based FME system. The discussed performance assessment and quality control framework can accelerate the clinical translation of fluorescence molecular imaging and endoscopy and steer further developments in the field.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3041715
Primary Topic
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiparametric standards for performance assessment and quality control of fluorescence molecular imaging and endoscopy systems

Dimitris Gorpas, Vasilis Ntziachristos
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
article

Multiparametric standards for performance assessment and quality control of fluorescence molecular imaging and endoscopy systems

Dimitris Gorpas, Vasilis Ntziachristos
article en

Abstract

Fluorescence molecular imaging (FMI) and endoscopy (FME) are technologies with great potential for image-guided surgical or diagnostic interventions. However, FMI and FME still present challenges that can confound real-time decision making for disease management and/or treatment. Importantly, the markedly different systems hurdle the repeatability of measurements, the unbiased readout interpretation, and the wide clinical acceptability of FMI and FME. Herein we present different multi-parametric standards to perform quality control and performance assessment of FMI and FME systems. Moreover, we discuss examples illustrating how data analysis and the design of fluorescence standards influence performance assessment outcomes, potentially affecting comparisons between systems or studies. We, also, show the first standard tailored to the requirements of FME and demonstrate its use for quality control of a fiberscope-based FME system. The discussed performance assessment and quality control framework can accelerate the clinical translation of fluorescence molecular imaging and endoscopy and steer further developments in the field.

Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Multiparametric standards for performance assessment and quality control of fluorescence molecular imaging and endoscopy systems — Dimitris Gorpas, Vasilis Ntziachristos · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS