Transient power-law behaviour following induction distinguishes between competing models of stochastic gene expression

What features of transcription can be learnt by fitting mathematical models of gene expression to mRNA count data? Given a suite of models, fitting to data selects an optimal one, thus identifying a probable transcriptional mechanism. Whilst attractive, the utility of this methodology remains unclear. Here, we sample steady-state, single-cell mRNA count distributions from parameters in the physiological range, and show they cannot be used to confidently estimate the number of inactive gene states, i.e. the number of rate-limiting steps in transcriptional initiation. Distributions from over 99% of the parameter space generated using models with 2, 3, or 4 inactive states can be well fit by one with a single inactive state. However, we show that for many minutes following induction, eukaryotic cells show an increase in the mean mRNA count that obeys a power law whose exponent equals the sum of the number of states visited from the initial inactive to the active state and the number of rate-limiting post-transcriptional processing steps. Our study shows that estimation of the exponent from eukaryotic data can be sufficient to determine a lower bound on the total number of regulatory steps in transcription initiation, splicing, and nuclear export.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58127-4
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transient power-law behaviour following induction distinguishes between competing models of stochastic gene expression

Juraj Szavits-Nossan, M. R. Evans, Ramon Grima, Andrew G. Nicoll
11 citations
Nature Communications
Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
8.87
article

Transient power-law behaviour following induction distinguishes between competing models of stochastic gene expression

Juraj Szavits-Nossan, M. R. Evans, Ramon Grima, Andrew G. Nicoll
article en
11 citations

Abstract

What features of transcription can be learnt by fitting mathematical models of gene expression to mRNA count data? Given a suite of models, fitting to data selects an optimal one, thus identifying a probable transcriptional mechanism. Whilst attractive, the utility of this methodology remains unclear. Here, we sample steady-state, single-cell mRNA count distributions from parameters in the physiological range, and show they cannot be used to confidently estimate the number of inactive gene states, i.e. the number of rate-limiting steps in transcriptional initiation. Distributions from over 99% of the parameter space generated using models with 2, 3, or 4 inactive states can be well fit by one with a single inactive state. However, we show that for many minutes following induction, eukaryotic cells show an increase in the mean mRNA count that obeys a power law whose exponent equals the sum of the number of states visited from the initial inactive to the active state and the number of rate-limiting post-transcriptional processing steps. Our study shows that estimation of the exponent from eukaryotic data can be sufficient to determine a lower bound on the total number of regulatory steps in transcription initiation, splicing, and nuclear export.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Leverhulme Trust
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
8.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Transient power-law behaviour following induction distinguishes between competing models of stochastic gene expression — Juraj Szavits-Nossan, M. R. Evans, et al. · Nature Communications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS