Sustainable strategic management: how speed and flexibility drive performance through innovation

Purpose Different studies have found different results about how certain aspects of strategic agility – strategic speed (SS) and flexibility (SF) – affect companies’ performance. While some researchers show that SS and SF fail to strengthen performance, others disagree. However, insufficient effort has been made to resolve this conflict. This makes it difficult to benchmark industry best practices. It also impedes academic progress in strategic management. This study seeks to offer clarity to the literature. It introduces sustainable innovation as an intervener in the SS–sustainable performance and SF–sustainable performance relationships. Design/methodology/approach Data were solicited from 587 managers across three industries – mining, banking and food & beverage – in an emerging economy. The data were analysed using partial least squares-structural equation modelling. Findings Sustainable innovation partially intervened in the SS–sustainable performance and SF–sustainable performance relationships. It explained 25.322% and 47.344% of the variance, respectively. SF accounted for nearly twice the variance compared to SS. The findings revealed that strategic flexibility is more crucial than strategic speed regarding the implementation of sustainability initiatives. Research limitations/implications Further research should introduce other mediators, such as organisational ambidexterity. This concept helps to explore new opportunities simultaneously while exploiting existing capabilities. Further studies could also explore the moderating role of sustainable leadership. Practical implications Practical lessons for large companies, small- and medium-sized enterprises and government are discussed. Originality/value This paper solves a major theoretical puzzle in the field. It explains why some agile companies succeed in sustainability while others struggle. Sustainable innovation is the key differentiator. The paper also shows how traditional strategic concepts like strategic speed and flexibility can be repurposed for sustainability goals. The paper improves our theoretical understanding of which aspects of strategic agility matter most for sustainable outcomes. It contributes to the field of sustainable strategic management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Process Management Journal
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-01-2025-0130
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
28.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable strategic management: how speed and flexibility drive performance through innovation

Samuel Koomson
13 citations
Business Process Management Journal
Innovation and Knowledge Management
28.94
article

Sustainable strategic management: how speed and flexibility drive performance through innovation

Samuel Koomson
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Purpose Different studies have found different results about how certain aspects of strategic agility – strategic speed (SS) and flexibility (SF) – affect companies’ performance. While some researchers show that SS and SF fail to strengthen performance, others disagree. However, insufficient effort has been made to resolve this conflict. This makes it difficult to benchmark industry best practices. It also impedes academic progress in strategic management. This study seeks to offer clarity to the literature. It introduces sustainable innovation as an intervener in the SS–sustainable performance and SF–sustainable performance relationships. Design/methodology/approach Data were solicited from 587 managers across three industries – mining, banking and food & beverage – in an emerging economy. The data were analysed using partial least squares-structural equation modelling. Findings Sustainable innovation partially intervened in the SS–sustainable performance and SF–sustainable performance relationships. It explained 25.322% and 47.344% of the variance, respectively. SF accounted for nearly twice the variance compared to SS. The findings revealed that strategic flexibility is more crucial than strategic speed regarding the implementation of sustainability initiatives. Research limitations/implications Further research should introduce other mediators, such as organisational ambidexterity. This concept helps to explore new opportunities simultaneously while exploiting existing capabilities. Further studies could also explore the moderating role of sustainable leadership. Practical implications Practical lessons for large companies, small- and medium-sized enterprises and government are discussed. Originality/value This paper solves a major theoretical puzzle in the field. It explains why some agile companies succeed in sustainability while others struggle. Sustainable innovation is the key differentiator. The paper also shows how traditional strategic concepts like strategic speed and flexibility can be repurposed for sustainability goals. The paper improves our theoretical understanding of which aspects of strategic agility matter most for sustainable outcomes. It contributes to the field of sustainable strategic management.

Business Process Management JournalVol. 32(2)
University of Professional Studies (GH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
28.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.