People Living with Chronic Pain Experience a High Prevalence of Decision Regret in Canada: A Pan-Canadian Online Survey

Background(1) To estimate the prevalence of decision regret in chronic pain care, and (2) to identify factors associated with decision regret.DesignWe conducted a pan-Canadian cross-sectional online survey and reported the results following the Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies guidelines. We recruited a sample of adults experiencing chronic noncancer pain. We used a stratified proportional random sampling based on the population and chronic pain prevalence of each province. We measured decision regret with the Decision Regret Scale (DRS) and decisional needs with the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. We performed descriptive analysis to estimate the prevalence and level of decision regret and multilevel multivariable regression analysis to identify factors associated with regret according to the STRengthening Analytical Thinking for Observational Studies recommendations.ResultsWe surveyed 1,649 people living with chronic pain, and 1,373 reported a most difficult decision from the 10 prespecified ones, enabling the collection of a DRS score. On a scale ranging from 0 to 100 where 1 reflects the presence of decision regret and 25 constitutes important decision regret, the mean DRS score in our sample was 28.8 (<i>s</i> = 19.6). Eighty-four percent of respondents experienced some decision regret and 50% at an important level. We identified 15 factors associated with decision regret, including 4 personal and 9 decision-making characteristics, and 2 consequences of the chosen option. Respondents with low education level and higher decisional conflict experienced more decision regret when the decision was deemed difficult.ConclusionsThis pan-Canadian survey highlighted a high prevalence and level of decision regret associated with difficult decisions for pain care. Decision making in pain care could be enhanced by addressing factors that contribute to decision regret.HighlightsWe conducted an online pan-Canadian survey and collected responses from a wide diversity of people living with chronic pain.More than 84% of respondents experienced decision regret and approximately 50% at an important level.We identified 15 factors associated with decision regret, including 4 personal and 9 decision-making characteristics, and 2 consequences of the chosen option.Our pan-Canadian survey reveals an urgent need of a shared decision-making approach in chronic pain care that can be potentiated by targeting multiple factors associated with decision regret.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Decision Making
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x251326069
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

People Living with Chronic Pain Experience a High Prevalence of Decision Regret in Canada: A Pan-Canadian Online Survey

France Légaré, Chloé Cachinho, Alison M. Hoens, Jean‐Sébastien Paquette et al.
2 citations
Medical Decision Making
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
5.63
article

People Living with Chronic Pain Experience a High Prevalence of Decision Regret in Canada: A Pan-Canadian Online Survey

France Légaré, Chloé Cachinho, Alison M. Hoens, Jean‐Sébastien Paquette, Karine Toupin‐April, Yannick Tousignant‐Laflamme, Marie-Ève Poitras, Annie LeBlanc, Isabelle Gaboury, Maxime Sasseville, Olivia Dubois, Simon Décary, Marie-Dominique Poirier, Florian Naye, Linda Li, Thomas Gérard
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Background(1) To estimate the prevalence of decision regret in chronic pain care, and (2) to identify factors associated with decision regret.DesignWe conducted a pan-Canadian cross-sectional online survey and reported the results following the Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies guidelines. We recruited a sample of adults experiencing chronic noncancer pain. We used a stratified proportional random sampling based on the population and chronic pain prevalence of each province. We measured decision regret with the Decision Regret Scale (DRS) and decisional needs with the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. We performed descriptive analysis to estimate the prevalence and level of decision regret and multilevel multivariable regression analysis to identify factors associated with regret according to the STRengthening Analytical Thinking for Observational Studies recommendations.ResultsWe surveyed 1,649 people living with chronic pain, and 1,373 reported a most difficult decision from the 10 prespecified ones, enabling the collection of a DRS score. On a scale ranging from 0 to 100 where 1 reflects the presence of decision regret and 25 constitutes important decision regret, the mean DRS score in our sample was 28.8 (<i>s</i> = 19.6). Eighty-four percent of respondents experienced some decision regret and 50% at an important level. We identified 15 factors associated with decision regret, including 4 personal and 9 decision-making characteristics, and 2 consequences of the chosen option. Respondents with low education level and higher decisional conflict experienced more decision regret when the decision was deemed difficult.ConclusionsThis pan-Canadian survey highlighted a high prevalence and level of decision regret associated with difficult decisions for pain care. Decision making in pain care could be enhanced by addressing factors that contribute to decision regret.HighlightsWe conducted an online pan-Canadian survey and collected responses from a wide diversity of people living with chronic pain.More than 84% of respondents experienced decision regret and approximately 50% at an important level.We identified 15 factors associated with decision regret, including 4 personal and 9 decision-making characteristics, and 2 consequences of the chosen option.Our pan-Canadian survey reveals an urgent need of a shared decision-making approach in chronic pain care that can be potentiated by targeting multiple factors associated with decision regret.

Medical Decision MakingVol. 45(4)
Université de Sherbrooke (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Ottawa (CA), Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean (CA), Research Canada (CA), Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (CA), Institut du Savoir Montfort (CA), Centres Intégré Universitaires de Santé et de Services Sociaux (CA), Université Laval (CA), Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CA)
Institute of Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
5.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.