Multi‐joint approach for assessing lower limb proprioception: Reliability and precision in school‐aged children

The joint position reproduction (JPR) approach is commonly used to assess joint position sense (JPS), but its psychometric properties in children remain unexplored. This study aimed to assess the reliability and precision of a multi-joint JPR protocol for assessing lower-limb JPS in typically developing (TD) children. Ankle, knee, and hip JPS were assessed in TD children (aged 5-12 years), on two different days, by a single rater using a standardized JPR protocol. The mean and best error (joint reproduction error, °) between the target and reproduction angle were calculated from three-dimensional kinematics for each joint across three trials. Total, joint, and limb JRE scores were provided. For JPR reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC, 2.1) was reported. For JPR precision, the standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable difference (SDD) were calculated. Across 270 JPR trials (15 children, 8.6 ± 1.2 years, 8 boys), the mean and best JRE were 3.7° and 2.5°, respectively. The ICC ranged from poor to fair (0.01-0.44) for mean JRE, and fair to very good (0.46-0.77) for best JRE. The SEM ranged from 0.8° to 1.8°. The SDD was less than 5°, ranging from 2.3° to 4.5°. Evaluating ankle, knee, and hip JPS in children using passive JPR is more reliable and precise when using the best JRE. This study highlights the need for a multi-joint JPR approach and provide joint- and limb-specific SEM and SDD values.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15305
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Children's Physical and Motor Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi‐joint approach for assessing lower limb proprioception: Reliability and precision in school‐aged children

Pieter Meyns, Maud van den Bogaart, Ann Hallemans, Nina Jacobs
2 citations
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Children's Physical and Motor Development
6.89
article

Multi‐joint approach for assessing lower limb proprioception: Reliability and precision in school‐aged children

Pieter Meyns, Maud van den Bogaart, Ann Hallemans, Nina Jacobs
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The joint position reproduction (JPR) approach is commonly used to assess joint position sense (JPS), but its psychometric properties in children remain unexplored. This study aimed to assess the reliability and precision of a multi-joint JPR protocol for assessing lower-limb JPS in typically developing (TD) children. Ankle, knee, and hip JPS were assessed in TD children (aged 5-12 years), on two different days, by a single rater using a standardized JPR protocol. The mean and best error (joint reproduction error, °) between the target and reproduction angle were calculated from three-dimensional kinematics for each joint across three trials. Total, joint, and limb JRE scores were provided. For JPR reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC, 2.1) was reported. For JPR precision, the standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable difference (SDD) were calculated. Across 270 JPR trials (15 children, 8.6 ± 1.2 years, 8 boys), the mean and best JRE were 3.7° and 2.5°, respectively. The ICC ranged from poor to fair (0.01-0.44) for mean JRE, and fair to very good (0.46-0.77) for best JRE. The SEM ranged from 0.8° to 1.8°. The SDD was less than 5°, ranging from 2.3° to 4.5°. Evaluating ankle, knee, and hip JPS in children using passive JPR is more reliable and precise when using the best JRE. This study highlights the need for a multi-joint JPR approach and provide joint- and limb-specific SEM and SDD values.

Annals of the New York Academy of SciencesVol. 1546(1)
University of Antwerp (BE), Hasselt University (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Children's Physical and Motor Development
6.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.