COMPARISON OF WOUND INFECTION BETWEEN PRIMARY RESECTION WITH ANASTOMOSIS AND COLOSTOMY IN SIGMOID VOLVULUS

Objective: This study aimed to compare the frequency of wound infection between two surgical approaches, primary resection with anastomosis (RA) and Hartmann’s procedure (HP) in patients diagnosed with sigmoid volvulus. Methodology: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Surgery, HMC Hospital, Peshawar, from 15-Jan-2023 to 15-July-2023. A total of 166 patients were enrolled and equally divided into two groups: 83 underwent RA, and 83 underwent HP. Participants were selected based on strict inclusion criteria, including age (18–60 years) and both gender. Patients were monitored for 30 days to assess wound infection, defined by clinical signs such as redness, swelling, or purulent discharge confirmed by laboratory culture. Results: The study found that wound infection rates were 20.5% in the RA group and 14.5% in the HP group. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.30). Both procedures demonstrated comparable outcomes in terms of postoperative infection rates. Conclusion: The findings suggest that both RA and HP are viable surgical options for managing sigmoid volvulus, with no significant difference in wound infection rates. The choice of procedure should be guided by patient-specific factors, such as clinical severity and overall health status. Both approaches require diligent postoperative care to minimize complications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71000/0n5v5w96
Primary Topic
Intestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARISON OF WOUND INFECTION BETWEEN PRIMARY RESECTION WITH ANASTOMOSIS AND COLOSTOMY IN SIGMOID VOLVULUS

Mahnoor Javed, Abbas Khan, Zahid Aman, Iqra et al.
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Intestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders
article

COMPARISON OF WOUND INFECTION BETWEEN PRIMARY RESECTION WITH ANASTOMOSIS AND COLOSTOMY IN SIGMOID VOLVULUS

Mahnoor Javed, Abbas Khan, Zahid Aman, Iqra, Syed Noor ul Amin
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the frequency of wound infection between two surgical approaches, primary resection with anastomosis (RA) and Hartmann’s procedure (HP) in patients diagnosed with sigmoid volvulus. Methodology: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Surgery, HMC Hospital, Peshawar, from 15-Jan-2023 to 15-July-2023. A total of 166 patients were enrolled and equally divided into two groups: 83 underwent RA, and 83 underwent HP. Participants were selected based on strict inclusion criteria, including age (18–60 years) and both gender. Patients were monitored for 30 days to assess wound infection, defined by clinical signs such as redness, swelling, or purulent discharge confirmed by laboratory culture. Results: The study found that wound infection rates were 20.5% in the RA group and 14.5% in the HP group. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.30). Both procedures demonstrated comparable outcomes in terms of postoperative infection rates. Conclusion: The findings suggest that both RA and HP are viable surgical options for managing sigmoid volvulus, with no significant difference in wound infection rates. The choice of procedure should be guided by patient-specific factors, such as clinical severity and overall health status. Both approaches require diligent postoperative care to minimize complications.

Insights-Journal of Health and RehabilitationVol. 3(2 (Health & Rehab))
Khyber Medical College (PK), Hayatabad Medical Complex (PK), Khyber Girls Medical College
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Intestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.