Impacts of an energy sparing feed additive on turkeys fed titrating reduced energy diets

Providing amino acids, energy, and minerals are costly dietary components in formulating diets for turkeys, with corn, soybean meal, and oils being of utmost interest due to their percent inclusion levels. In addition, the highest feed consumption occurs in the grower-finisher (GF) phase of production making diet formulation during this period of growth critically important. Reducing feed cost through reductions in expensive energy sources (e.g., fats) in a turkey diet while maintaining performance and carcass traits could greatly benefit turkey production profitability. The current study evaluated the effects of the addition of a commercial energy sparing feed additive (Enercore®, Biosen LLC) in a series of reducing energy diets. Dietary treatments included a commercial control diet (CON) and 3 experimental diets with different levels of reduced Kcal to equal a 50 Kcal/kg deficit (ESFA 1), 70 Kcal/kg deficit (ESFA 2), and 100 Kcal/kg deficit (ESFA 3) with the inclusion of 1 kg/tonne of Enercore. At placement, 1,800 male turkeys were evenly placed across dietary treatments (n = 8 per treatment) and provided their dietary treatment through 18 wk of age. Body weights and feed weights were taken every 5 wk and before loadout. At 17 wk of age, one tom per pen was weighed and euthanized to determine breast yield and deboned thigh yield. Body weights and mortality percent were similar across diets at the end of 18 wk of age (P > 0.140). Whereas, mortality-adjusted FCR was altered with dietary treatment with toms fed ESFA 2 having the lowest mortality-adjusted FCR (P < 0.001) compared to all other dietary treatments. For carcass measurements, live weights of birds sampled, breast yield, and deboned thigh yield were similar between treatments (P > 0.220). In conclusion, removal of 50 and 70 Kcal/kg of energy in turkey diets supplemented with an energy sparing feed additive did not significantly alter body weight or carcass yield but only the removal of 70 Kcal/kg with the ESFA, Enercore®, improved feed conversion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Poultry Science
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2025.105046
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impacts of an energy sparing feed additive on turkeys fed titrating reduced energy diets

Dawn Koltes, Brett C. Ramirez, B. J. Kerr, Bryan Wilson
1 citations
Poultry Science
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
1.19
article

Impacts of an energy sparing feed additive on turkeys fed titrating reduced energy diets

Dawn Koltes, Brett C. Ramirez, B. J. Kerr, Bryan Wilson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Providing amino acids, energy, and minerals are costly dietary components in formulating diets for turkeys, with corn, soybean meal, and oils being of utmost interest due to their percent inclusion levels. In addition, the highest feed consumption occurs in the grower-finisher (GF) phase of production making diet formulation during this period of growth critically important. Reducing feed cost through reductions in expensive energy sources (e.g., fats) in a turkey diet while maintaining performance and carcass traits could greatly benefit turkey production profitability. The current study evaluated the effects of the addition of a commercial energy sparing feed additive (Enercore®, Biosen LLC) in a series of reducing energy diets. Dietary treatments included a commercial control diet (CON) and 3 experimental diets with different levels of reduced Kcal to equal a 50 Kcal/kg deficit (ESFA 1), 70 Kcal/kg deficit (ESFA 2), and 100 Kcal/kg deficit (ESFA 3) with the inclusion of 1 kg/tonne of Enercore. At placement, 1,800 male turkeys were evenly placed across dietary treatments (n = 8 per treatment) and provided their dietary treatment through 18 wk of age. Body weights and feed weights were taken every 5 wk and before loadout. At 17 wk of age, one tom per pen was weighed and euthanized to determine breast yield and deboned thigh yield. Body weights and mortality percent were similar across diets at the end of 18 wk of age (P > 0.140). Whereas, mortality-adjusted FCR was altered with dietary treatment with toms fed ESFA 2 having the lowest mortality-adjusted FCR (P < 0.001) compared to all other dietary treatments. For carcass measurements, live weights of birds sampled, breast yield, and deboned thigh yield were similar between treatments (P > 0.220). In conclusion, removal of 50 and 70 Kcal/kg of energy in turkey diets supplemented with an energy sparing feed additive did not significantly alter body weight or carcass yield but only the removal of 70 Kcal/kg with the ESFA, Enercore®, improved feed conversion.

Poultry ScienceVol. 104(5)
Iowa State University (US), National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.