Identification of superficial invasive and indolent lymphomatous lymph nodes by multiple ultrasonographic vascular imaging

This study aimed to explore whether superficial invasive lymphomas and indolent lymphomas could be identified by Ultrasonographic vascular imaging. A retrospective study enrolled 82 lymphoma patients. According to proliferation rates and clinical course, the lymph nodes were classified as invasive and indolent lymphomatous lymph nodes. All patients underwent ultrasound (US) with three established techniques: color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI), angio plus ultrasound imaging (AngioPLUS™), and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Qualitative and quantitative parameters from the two groups were compared. Finally, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) and regression analysis were used to compare the differences between the two groups and determine the diagnostic efficiency of the three techniques for differentiating invasive lymphoma from indolent lymphoma. The types of blood flow distribution between invasive and indolent lymphomatous lymph nodes were statistically different in all three Ultrasound techniques. In CDFI, invasive or indolent lymphomatous lymph nodes were determined by resistance index (RI) (p < 0.001). AngioPLUSTM offered better blood flow performance and diagnostic sensitivity than CDFI. In CEUS, the differences between the two groups in necrosis and arrival time (ATM) (p = 0.026, 0.043) were statistically significant. Finally, CDFI combined with CEUS had the highest diagnostic sensitivity of 98.1%. Interobserver agreements for qualitative parameters were all excellent. Ultrasonographic Vascular imaging is useful in identifying invasive and indolent lymphomatous lymph nodes, and CDFI combined with CEUS had the highest diagnostic sensitivity, which can guide clinicians to make more accurate diagnosis and better treatment for patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-93545-w
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of superficial invasive and indolent lymphomatous lymph nodes by multiple ultrasonographic vascular imaging

Hongyan Deng, Xinhua Ye, Wenqin Chen, Wenjuan Lu et al.
Scientific Reports
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Identification of superficial invasive and indolent lymphomatous lymph nodes by multiple ultrasonographic vascular imaging

Hongyan Deng, Xinhua Ye, Wenqin Chen, Wenjuan Lu, Lin Li, Hua Shu, Pingyang Zhang
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to explore whether superficial invasive lymphomas and indolent lymphomas could be identified by Ultrasonographic vascular imaging. A retrospective study enrolled 82 lymphoma patients. According to proliferation rates and clinical course, the lymph nodes were classified as invasive and indolent lymphomatous lymph nodes. All patients underwent ultrasound (US) with three established techniques: color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI), angio plus ultrasound imaging (AngioPLUS™), and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Qualitative and quantitative parameters from the two groups were compared. Finally, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) and regression analysis were used to compare the differences between the two groups and determine the diagnostic efficiency of the three techniques for differentiating invasive lymphoma from indolent lymphoma. The types of blood flow distribution between invasive and indolent lymphomatous lymph nodes were statistically different in all three Ultrasound techniques. In CDFI, invasive or indolent lymphomatous lymph nodes were determined by resistance index (RI) (p < 0.001). AngioPLUSTM offered better blood flow performance and diagnostic sensitivity than CDFI. In CEUS, the differences between the two groups in necrosis and arrival time (ATM) (p = 0.026, 0.043) were statistically significant. Finally, CDFI combined with CEUS had the highest diagnostic sensitivity of 98.1%. Interobserver agreements for qualitative parameters were all excellent. Ultrasonographic Vascular imaging is useful in identifying invasive and indolent lymphomatous lymph nodes, and CDFI combined with CEUS had the highest diagnostic sensitivity, which can guide clinicians to make more accurate diagnosis and better treatment for patients.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Jiangsu Province Hospital (CN), Nanjing Medical University (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.