Predicting Australian federal electoral seats with machine learning

I expand the international literature on election forecasting with the first application of machine learning (ML) in the Australian context. I apply these models to five elections from 2010 to 2022 and compare them with the dominant forecasting tool in Australia, the Mackerras pendulum. I evaluate these models’ accuracy in predicting the winning party for each electoral seat and estimating the total number of seats won by each party. Pendulum forecasts corrected with an extra trees model that incorporates state effects, seat-level unemployment rate, and vote share history predict up to 15 additional seats correctly six to three months before each election. The traditional pendulum is increasingly strained by polling errors and a larger crossbench. New modeling techniques will only emerge through experimentation. This study demonstrates the potential for ML-based election forecasting in Australia and provides a starting point for further efforts to surpass the pendulum.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Forecasting
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2025.02.002
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Australian federal electoral seats with machine learning

John T. Collins
International Journal of Forecasting
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
article

Predicting Australian federal electoral seats with machine learning

John T. Collins
article en

Abstract

I expand the international literature on election forecasting with the first application of machine learning (ML) in the Australian context. I apply these models to five elections from 2010 to 2022 and compare them with the dominant forecasting tool in Australia, the Mackerras pendulum. I evaluate these models’ accuracy in predicting the winning party for each electoral seat and estimating the total number of seats won by each party. Pendulum forecasts corrected with an extra trees model that incorporates state effects, seat-level unemployment rate, and vote share history predict up to 15 additional seats correctly six to three months before each election. The traditional pendulum is increasingly strained by polling errors and a larger crossbench. New modeling techniques will only emerge through experimentation. This study demonstrates the potential for ML-based election forecasting in Australia and provides a starting point for further efforts to surpass the pendulum.

International Journal of ForecastingVol. 41(4)
University of Mannheim (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.