Not a gap but an overlap: project teams and exploration vs exploitation in technological innovation

Purpose Companies in the financial services sector are faced with a turbulent, destabilizing environment and challenged to maintain existing activities while seizing new opportunities to remain competitive. In this vein, technological innovation project teams play a key role, and therefore understanding how these teams work and how their members interact throughout the life cycle of a technological innovation project is important. Design/methodology/approach This research, carried out in a large financial institution, analyzes five technological innovation projects and their teams over an entire year to better understand the evolution from the exploration phase to the exploitation phase during the life cycle of such projects. To do so, the authors conducted a qualitative case study, in which they took both observer and participant roles. They analyzed the data using NVivo software and created a data structure in accordance with the Gioia method. Findings The findings show an overlap phase between exploration and exploitation, with work on the product preceding work on the business model. This finding implies an adaptation of models presuming a sequential transition from exploration to exploitation and leads to managerial implications on how to manage the simultaneity of both logics during the identified overlap. Research limitations/implications Research focuses on one traditional company, limiting generalizability to newer, smaller firms. Practical implications Research shows that companies with contextual ambidexterity manage innovation better than those with structural ambidexterity by allowing flexible integration of exploration and exploitation tasks, promoting smoother transitions in innovation phases. Social implications Research enhancing understanding of innovation processes is crucial for better management and could improve company culture and work–life balance for project teams. Originality/value This research follows teams during the life cycle of five technological innovation projects and reveals a key moment that has been relatively understudied: the transition between the exploration phase and the exploitation phase. Highlights • This article examines teams involved in technological innovation projects. • The main theoretical frameworks are organizational ambidexterity and team processes. • The research involves a study of five projects in a large European financial institution. • The findings reveal an overlapping phase between exploration and exploitation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Management Decision
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/md-04-2024-0863
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not a gap but an overlap: project teams and exploration vs exploitation in technological innovation

Jean‐Fabrice Lebraty, Véréna Hess
2 citations
Management Decision
Innovation and Knowledge Management
4.45
article

Not a gap but an overlap: project teams and exploration vs exploitation in technological innovation

Jean‐Fabrice Lebraty, Véréna Hess
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose Companies in the financial services sector are faced with a turbulent, destabilizing environment and challenged to maintain existing activities while seizing new opportunities to remain competitive. In this vein, technological innovation project teams play a key role, and therefore understanding how these teams work and how their members interact throughout the life cycle of a technological innovation project is important. Design/methodology/approach This research, carried out in a large financial institution, analyzes five technological innovation projects and their teams over an entire year to better understand the evolution from the exploration phase to the exploitation phase during the life cycle of such projects. To do so, the authors conducted a qualitative case study, in which they took both observer and participant roles. They analyzed the data using NVivo software and created a data structure in accordance with the Gioia method. Findings The findings show an overlap phase between exploration and exploitation, with work on the product preceding work on the business model. This finding implies an adaptation of models presuming a sequential transition from exploration to exploitation and leads to managerial implications on how to manage the simultaneity of both logics during the identified overlap. Research limitations/implications Research focuses on one traditional company, limiting generalizability to newer, smaller firms. Practical implications Research shows that companies with contextual ambidexterity manage innovation better than those with structural ambidexterity by allowing flexible integration of exploration and exploitation tasks, promoting smoother transitions in innovation phases. Social implications Research enhancing understanding of innovation processes is crucial for better management and could improve company culture and work–life balance for project teams. Originality/value This research follows teams during the life cycle of five technological innovation projects and reveals a key moment that has been relatively understudied: the transition between the exploration phase and the exploitation phase. Highlights • This article examines teams involved in technological innovation projects. • The main theoretical frameworks are organizational ambidexterity and team processes. • The research involves a study of five projects in a large European financial institution. • The findings reveal an overlapping phase between exploration and exploitation.

Management Decision
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
4.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.