The Elbert range of magnetostrophic convection. II. Comparing linear theory to nonlinear low- <i>Rm</i> simulations

The magnetostrophic dynamo hypothesis has greatly influenced planetary dynamo research. Many magnetostrophic dynamo theories are founded upon the linear stability analysis by Chandrasekhar and Elbert, and by the canonical laboratory photographs taken by Nakagawa that show a significant enlargement of the convective flow scales in the magnetostrophic regime of liquid metal rotating magnetoconvection (RMC). We test whether these linear predictions are relevant for the nonlinear RMC system by exploring the five possible regimes using direct numerical simulations of RMC in the low magnetic Reynolds number quasi-static approximation. We map out the heat and momentum transport in these regimes, look at the flow structures and focus especially on the length scales. We have also included numerical counterparts of Nakagawa’s experiments and our results show an excellent agreement with three of these cases and linear theory. However, agreement with Nakagawa is not found in the magnetostrophic case: no enlargement of scales is observed, but still in good agreement with linear theory. Oscillatory bulk modes dominate all the RMC cases in which they exist, thus, suggesting that oscillatory convective flows may dominate all the other convective modes in planetary cores and may provide the motions that primarily generate planetary dynamo action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2024.0016
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Elbert range of magnetostrophic convection. II. Comparing linear theory to nonlinear low- Rm simulations

J. M. Aurnou, Susanne Horn
6 citations
Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
4.84
article

The Elbert range of magnetostrophic convection. II. Comparing linear theory to nonlinear low- Rm simulations

J. M. Aurnou, Susanne Horn
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The magnetostrophic dynamo hypothesis has greatly influenced planetary dynamo research. Many magnetostrophic dynamo theories are founded upon the linear stability analysis by Chandrasekhar and Elbert, and by the canonical laboratory photographs taken by Nakagawa that show a significant enlargement of the convective flow scales in the magnetostrophic regime of liquid metal rotating magnetoconvection (RMC). We test whether these linear predictions are relevant for the nonlinear RMC system by exploring the five possible regimes using direct numerical simulations of RMC in the low magnetic Reynolds number quasi-static approximation. We map out the heat and momentum transport in these regimes, look at the flow structures and focus especially on the length scales. We have also included numerical counterparts of Nakagawa’s experiments and our results show an excellent agreement with three of these cases and linear theory. However, agreement with Nakagawa is not found in the magnetostrophic case: no enlargement of scales is observed, but still in good agreement with linear theory. Oscillatory bulk modes dominate all the RMC cases in which they exist, thus, suggesting that oscillatory convective flows may dominate all the other convective modes in planetary cores and may provide the motions that primarily generate planetary dynamo action.

Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesVol. 481(2310)
Planetary Science Institute (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Coventry University (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Division of Earth Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
4.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Elbert range of magnetostrophic convection. II. Comparing linear theory to nonlinear low- <i>Rm</i> simulations — J. M. Aurnou, Susanne Horn · Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS