Fire in the operating room, a hot topic? Guideline development for operating room fire incidents by a literature review, semi-structured expert interviews and a qualitative, descriptive, anonymized cross-sectional study

Background: The operating room (OR) is a high-risk environment which necessitates preparedness for potential life-threatening incidents, such as fulminant fires. Existing protocols lack specific guidelines for anesthesiologists regarding emergency evacuation, and steps to be undertaken when leaving patients under anesthesia. Objectives: This research aimed to assess the anesthesiologists’ preparedness to respond to fulminant fires in the OR and propose a safe to use guideline to optimize a patients’ chance of survival while minimizing the risk of awareness. Design: Methods included a literature study, multi-disciplinary expert interviews (variant Delphi method), and a qualitative, descriptive, anonymized cross-sectional study in a select sample by means of a survey distributed amongst the anesthesiologists and residents working in the Flemish university hospitals. As such, 297 anesthesiologists and residents were addressed of which 64 participated, equal to a response rate of 21,5%. Results: Results indicated inadequate preparedness, with less than half considering crucial measures during emergency evacuation without the patient such as reducing the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) (49.1%), deepening anesthesia (49.1%) or covering patient and ventilator with fire blankets (29,1%). Only 17.2% considered all three critical steps. Despite awareness of risks in the OR, only 36% could identify three specific risk factors. Self-reported confidence and perceived knowledge increased after guideline review by the participants. Conclusions: At this point research amongst Flemish anesthesiologists (and residents) suggests there is insufficient preparation for managing fulminant OR fires. The proposed guideline, addressing gaps in knowledge and actions, enhances readiness. These critical steps, when implemented, can maximize survival chances during an incident. Future efforts should focus on widespread guideline implementation and ongoing training, besides further and more thorough research regarding this topic.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56126/76.1.01
Primary Topic
Disaster Response and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fire in the operating room, a hot topic? Guideline development for operating room fire incidents by a literature review, semi-structured expert interviews and a qualitative, descriptive, anonymized cross-sectional study

Marianne Lauwers, Anouk Wouters
Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica
Disaster Response and Management
article

Fire in the operating room, a hot topic? Guideline development for operating room fire incidents by a literature review, semi-structured expert interviews and a qualitative, descriptive, anonymized cross-sectional study

Marianne Lauwers, Anouk Wouters
article en

Abstract

Background: The operating room (OR) is a high-risk environment which necessitates preparedness for potential life-threatening incidents, such as fulminant fires. Existing protocols lack specific guidelines for anesthesiologists regarding emergency evacuation, and steps to be undertaken when leaving patients under anesthesia. Objectives: This research aimed to assess the anesthesiologists’ preparedness to respond to fulminant fires in the OR and propose a safe to use guideline to optimize a patients’ chance of survival while minimizing the risk of awareness. Design: Methods included a literature study, multi-disciplinary expert interviews (variant Delphi method), and a qualitative, descriptive, anonymized cross-sectional study in a select sample by means of a survey distributed amongst the anesthesiologists and residents working in the Flemish university hospitals. As such, 297 anesthesiologists and residents were addressed of which 64 participated, equal to a response rate of 21,5%. Results: Results indicated inadequate preparedness, with less than half considering crucial measures during emergency evacuation without the patient such as reducing the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) (49.1%), deepening anesthesia (49.1%) or covering patient and ventilator with fire blankets (29,1%). Only 17.2% considered all three critical steps. Despite awareness of risks in the OR, only 36% could identify three specific risk factors. Self-reported confidence and perceived knowledge increased after guideline review by the participants. Conclusions: At this point research amongst Flemish anesthesiologists (and residents) suggests there is insufficient preparation for managing fulminant OR fires. The proposed guideline, addressing gaps in knowledge and actions, enhances readiness. These critical steps, when implemented, can maximize survival chances during an incident. Future efforts should focus on widespread guideline implementation and ongoing training, besides further and more thorough research regarding this topic.

Acta Anaesthesiologica BelgicaVol. 76(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Disaster Response and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.